Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

由 AI 自動生成
  • Henry: Today I've got guest and Physicist Max Tegmark here to answer some questions

    今天我請到了嘉賓和物理學家Max Tegmark來回答一些問題...

  • Ok, Max, why should I care about nuclear weapons?

    好吧,馬克斯,我為什麼要關心核武器?

  • Max: Because we've learned that they're even more dangerous than we first thought:

    麥克斯:因為我們已經瞭解到,他們比我們最初想象的還要危險。

  • The biggest threat from nukes isn't explosions that each kill millions of people, or radioactive

    核彈最大的威脅不是爆炸,每個人都會殺死數百萬人,也不是放射性的。

  • fallout that kills even more, or even a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse that causes mayhem by

    塵埃,殺死更多的人,甚至是高空電磁脈衝,造成混亂,通過

  • frying the electrical grid and electronics across a continent

    炸燬整個大陸的電網和電子線路。

  • No, the biggest threat from nuclear weapons is a global nuclear-induced winter, in which

    不,核武器的最大威脅是全球核引發的冬天,其中

  • the fires and smoke from as few as a thousand nukes could darken the atmosphere enough to

    一千枚核彈所產生的火光和濃煙足以讓大氣層變暗

  • plunge Earth into a planet-wide mini ice age with year-round winter-like conditions. This

    使地球陷入了一個全地球的小冰期,全年都有類似冬天的情況。這

  • could cause a complete collapse of the global food system and apocalyptic unrest, potentially

    可能會導致全球糧食系統的徹底崩潰和世界性的動盪,有可能會導致

  • killing most of us 7 billion people on Earth.

    殺死我們地球上70億人中的大部分人。

  • Henry: But didn't we get rid of most nuclear weapons when the cold war ended?

    亨利:但冷戰結束時,我們不是已經擺脫了大部分核武器嗎?

  • Max: WellYes and no. When the cold war ended, the US and Russia slashed their nuclear

    Max:嗯......是也不是。當冷戰結束後,美國和俄羅斯 削減了他們的核計劃。

  • arsenals, but they still have about 7000 nukes each, which could allow either country to

    但他們每個人仍有大約7000枚核彈,這可以讓任何一個國家都能。

  • create a nuclear winter all on its own, even if the other doesn't retaliate.

    自己製造一個核冬天,即使對方不報復。

  • Henry: But why should I worry about nuclear winter when nobody in their right mind would

    亨利:但我為什麼要擔心核冬天,因為沒有一個正常人會。

  • ever start a nuclear war? Max: Unfortunately, an all-out nuclear assault

    有沒有發動過核戰爭?不幸的是,一場全面的核攻擊。

  • isn't as unlikely as you might think, because the most likely way for nuclear war to start

    並不像你想象的那樣不可能 因為核戰爭最可能的爆發方式是

  • isn't politicalit's accidental. For example, the time faulty computer chips in

    不是政治性的,而是偶然性的。比如說,當有問題的電腦芯片在

  • US alarm systems erroneously signaled incoming Soviet missiles and the US started to prepare

    美國的警報系統錯誤地發出了蘇聯飛彈來襲的信號,美國開始準備

  • for full-blown retaliation. Or the time that Russian satellites mistook an unusual glint

    為全面的報復。或者說,俄羅斯衛星誤認為一個不尋常的光亮

  • of sunlight off of clouds for incoming American missiles and an officer averted retaliation

    遮住雲層的陽光,尋找來襲的美國飛彈,一名軍官避免了報復。

  • by ignoring the alarm on gut instinct. Or the time after the cold war ended when Russian

    忽視了直覺上的警報。或者是冷戰結束後的那段時間,當俄羅斯的

  • radar systems thought a Norwegian scientific rocket was an American nuclear missile and

    雷達系統認為挪威的科學火箭是美國的核導彈。

  • almost launched their missiles in retaliation. These close-calls keep happening, and sooner

    差點發射飛彈進行報復。這些險情不斷髮生,而且遲早會發生。

  • or later our luck is gonna run out and an entire nuclear arsenal will be launched accidentally.

    或者我們的運氣會用完,整個核武庫會被意外發射。

  • Henry: But isn't getting rid of nukes a national security threat?

    亨利:但擺脫核彈不是國家安全威脅嗎?

  • Max: Well, it's pretty clear that a country only needs a small number of nuclear weapons

    麥克斯:嗯,很明顯,一個國家只需要少量的核武器。

  • to effectively deter nuclear attacks, and any more are as much a national security threat

    有效遏制核攻擊,再多的核攻擊也是對國家安全的威脅。

  • to the nation that owns them as to the rest of the planet. So given the risks of accidental

    對擁有它們的國家和地球上的其他國家都是如此。是以,考慮到意外的風險。

  • nuclear war and nuclear winter, it's stupid, dangerous, and irresponsible for *any* country

    核戰爭和核冬天,對任何國家來說都是愚蠢、危險和不負責任的。

  • on earth to have more nuclear weapons than it needs for deterrence. If we just continue

    地球上的核武器數量超過了它的威懾需要。如果我們繼續

  • hoarding excessive nuclear arsenals, winter is coming.

    囤積過多的核武庫,冬天要來了。

  • Henry: OK, Max, one more question: why should I spend my time worrying about nukes when

    亨利,好吧,麥克斯,還有一個問題:好了,馬克斯,還有一個問題: 為什麼我應該花我的時間擔心核彈,當...

  • there's nothing I can do about them?

    我對他們無能為力?

  • Max: Actually, there *is* something you can do! The nuclear arms race isn't driven entirely

    麥克斯:事實上,你可以做一些事情!核軍備競賽並不完全是由...

  • by security interests: money drives it too, and politicians who like to act tough. In

    受安全利益的影響:金錢的驅使也是如此,喜歡裝逼的政客。在

  • a time when they really should be downgrading, the US & Russian governments are both planning

    在他們真正應該降級的時候,美國和俄羅斯政府都在計劃。

  • to upgrade their arsenals at a huge cost. And who does that money go to? Well, about

    來升級他們的武器庫,花費巨大。這些錢給誰呢?嗯,大約

  • 2% of S&P 500 companies are involved in nuclear weapons production, and while you can't

    2%的標準普爾500強公司參與了核武器生產,雖然你不能。

  • stop paying taxes, you can help stigmatize the nuclear arms race by divesting from companies

    停止納稅,你可以通過從公司撤資來幫助汙名化核軍備競賽。

  • that produce nuclear weapons. It's really easy, and I'll give you a link that you

    生產核武器的國家。這真的很簡單,我給你一個鏈接,你可以通過這個鏈接

  • can put in the video description to a site that helps you do just that.

    可以把視頻描述到一個網站,幫助你做到這一點。

  • Henry: Thanks, Max and thanks to the Future of Life Institute for their support and help

    亨利:謝謝你,馬克斯,感謝生命未來研究所的支持和幫助。

  • producing this video!

    製作這個視頻!

Henry: Today I've got guest and Physicist Max Tegmark here to answer some questions

今天我請到了嘉賓和物理學家Max Tegmark來回答一些問題...

字幕與單字
由 AI 自動生成

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋