He talked about roster construction here.

他在這裡談到了名冊建設。

They have to make a move.

他們必須有所行動。

I'm gonna get to that in a second.

我馬上就會說到這一點。

You want to blame someone on the court?

你想把責任推給球場上的人？

You can blame Kemba Walker because But it's it's which is Look, he has a bad knee.

你可以責怪肯巴-沃克，因為... ...但這是... ...他的膝蓋不好。

Kemba has a bad knee and he is known as a tough guy and the rial leader.

肯巴的膝蓋不好，他被稱為硬漢，也是rial領袖。

And so my sense is that a lot of guys probably wouldn't be playing if Kemba is playing like this as a result of the of the knee.

所以我的感覺是，如果肯巴因為膝蓋的原因打成這樣，很多人可能就不會打球了。

But of course he wants toe.

但他當然要腳趾。

He wants to play through.

他想玩完。

Look, the Celtics as constructed.

看，凱爾特人隊的構造。

They're a good team, and it's not that they're not a deep team like Robert Williams.

他們是一支優秀的球隊，並不是說他們不像羅伯特-威廉姆斯那樣是一支深厚的球隊。

That's a fine.

這是一個罰款。

You know.

你知道的

He can really long and he can play defense and entices a good player, and they have good players.

他真的可以長，他可以防守和誘導一個好球員，他們有好球員。

Marcus Smart was out right now is a good player, but these are all essentially defensive players.

馬庫斯-斯馬特現在出場是個好球員，但這些基本上都是防守球員。

When you look at the roster, it's not deep offensively.

當你看到這個名單時，它的攻擊力並不深。

You have two excellent wings in Tatum and Brown and you're right, Stephen.

你在塔圖姆和布朗身上有兩隻優秀的翅膀，你是對的，斯蒂芬。

It's more than a lot of teams have, but a lot of other teams would have more depth in terms of various players who can score, Obviously not on that level, but who can go get you some some points get go, get you some buckets.

這比很多球隊都要多，但是很多其他的球隊會有更多的深度，在各種能得分的球員方面，顯然不是那個級別的，但是誰能去給你拿一些一些分數拿去，給你拿一些扣籃。

Celtics don't have that.

凱爾特人沒有這個能力。

They're really relying on Kemba Toby, that other guy offensively.

他們真的很依賴肯巴-託比，另外那個人的進攻。

And when he's not, where do the Celtics get the points from?

而當他不在的時候，凱爾特人的分數從哪裡來？

It's hard, you know, Like, where?

這很難，你知道，比如，在哪裡？

Where do the Celtics get the points from, If not Tatum and Brown?

如果不是塔圖姆和布朗，凱爾特人從哪裡得到分數？

And it's not like Tatum and Brown are giving you the points.

而且塔圖姆和布朗也不會給你分。

It's not like Brad Stevens isn't doing things to create opportunities for them, and Thio kind of optimize to maximize what they have.

布拉德-史蒂文斯也不是不做事情，為他們創造機會，Thio種優化，讓他們擁有的東西最大化。

He is, and they are.

他是，他們也是。

They're great and everyone knows it.

他們是偉大的，每個人都知道這一點。

But who else is there?

但還有誰呢？

It's supposed to be Kemba.

應該是肯巴。

If Kemba is right, we talk about big threes.

如果肯巴是對的，我們就談大三分。

That's a legit Big Three.

這是一個合法的三巨頭。

If Kemba is right, he has not been Kemba Walker.

如果肯巴是對的，他還沒有成為肯巴-沃克。

And when Kemba shoots like he does last night, you're not gonna win.

如果肯巴像昨晚那樣投籃，你就贏不了。

Ah, couple games ago, then you might win right, that's what it is.

啊，幾場比賽前，那你可能會贏吧，就是這樣。

I can't look at Brad Stevens and say That's on him.

我不能看著布拉德-史蒂文斯說，這是他。

I'll say it's I don't even like to say it's on Kim because I think he's hurt.

我說是我都不願意說是金的，因為我覺得他受傷了。

But if you want to blame someone on the who's actually playing, you can point to Kemba Walker when he doesn't hit shots.

但如果你想指責誰的實際發揮，你可以在肯巴-沃克不投籃的時候指責他。

Very tough for them to win.

對他們來說，非常難贏。

You wanna point someone off the court?

你想把人趕出球場？

Danny Ainge?

丹尼-艾格？

Well, first of all, you could look at camera.

好吧，首先，你可以看看相機。

Clearly, he's not 100% healthy.

顯然，他不是100%健康。

Just look into his shots on the highlights alone.

單單從亮點上看，就能看進他的鏡頭。

You see him leaning heavily and favoring his left leg, heavily trying to stay off that right leg.

你看他重重地傾斜著，偏向於左腿，重重地想從那條右腿上離開。

That's number one, but number two Or more importantly, let me tell you something.

這是第一條，但第二條... ...或者更重要的是，讓我告訴你一些事情。

Your points would be valid.

你的觀點將是有效的。

If we're talking about championships, I get that.

如果我們談論的是冠軍，我明白。

It's not valid because we're talking about a team that's at 500.

這是不成立的，因為我們談論的是一支500分的球隊。

They should not be a 500 team.

他們不應該成為500強球隊。

They should not be given up 24 point leads from the third quarter on.

從第三節開始，他們就不應該給人24分的領先優勢。

If you were good enough to be up 24 points, you should be good enough to hold onto the lead.

如果你足夠優秀，能領先24分，你應該足夠優秀，能守住領先優勢。

Not that That's the kind of stuff doesn't happen in the NBA because we understand that it does.

並不是說這種事情不會在NBA發生，因為我們明白這種事情會發生。

But there are too many occasions where we've looked at the Boston Celtics, who have been in games, who have had leads, who have blown leads, who haven't been, who have just fallen apart.

但是，我們看波士頓凱爾特人，有太多的場合，他們在比賽中，有領先過的，有吹過的，有沒領先過的，都是一塌糊塗。

And we wonder what the hell is going on.

而我們卻不知道這到底是怎麼回事。

And the reality is that that's Brad Stevens job to fix it when you got 30 teams in the N.

而現實是，這是布拉德-史蒂文斯的工作，以解決它，當你有30支球隊在N。

B.

B.

A.

A.

This is a very big, coveted job.

這是一個非常大的，令人羨慕的工作。

A lot of people want opportunities to be a head coach in the NBA, and if you have a situation where you've got two studs like that, you gotta know how to close.

很多人都想有機會在NBA當主教練，如果你有這樣兩個種馬的情況，你要知道如何收尾。

You gotta know how to finish.

你得知道如何完成。

They've been to a couple of conference finals.

他們已經進入了幾次大會決賽。

We get that and Brad Stevens coach again.

我們得到了，布拉德-史蒂文斯再次教練。

Nobody is questioning this coaching ability.

沒有人質疑這個教練能力。

What we're saying is, in the end, the personnel that you have available are you maximizing the potential off all those guys around Tatum and Brown because table them and Brown are gonna be who they are, Who are the other dudes that are going to step up for you?

我們要說的是，到最後，你可用的人員是你最大限度地發揮了塔圖姆和布朗身邊所有這些人的潛力，因為表他們和布朗會成為他們是誰，其他的花花公子是誰要為你站出來？

What kind of system do you have?

你的系統是什麼樣的？

How you utilizing the personnel that you have available to you?

你如何利用你現有的人員？

Etcetera, etcetera.

等等，等等。

Anybody else would be asking that question about Why does Brad Stevens get past in terms of asking those questions?

別人都會問這個問題，為什麼布拉德-史蒂文斯能在問這些問題方面過去？

That's the bottom line.

這是底線。

I wouldn't say he gets a pass.

我不會說他得到一個通過。

I think if you just analyze it, you have two guys you could look at to say, like, What's the Celtics?

我覺得如果你只是分析一下，你有兩個人你可以看看說，比如說，凱爾特人是什麼？

I'll give you be more specific, you know, in terms of your point.

我會給你更具體的，你知道，在你的觀點。

I think it's late.

我想已經很晚了。

Game collapses, right?

遊戲崩潰了吧？

Because it happened again and this time in a huge, obvious way.

因為它又發生了，而且這次是以一種巨大的、明顯的方式。

Another late game Celtics collapse and we can look at defense.

末節比賽凱爾特人又崩盤了，我們可以看看防守。

But really, it's the organizer of the offense.

但其實，這是進攻的組織者。

It's the guy who's making the decisions.

是那個做決定的人。

Marcus Smart is out, and Kemba Walker's hurt.

馬庫斯・斯馬特出局了，肯巴・沃克也受傷了。

I think really, that's what's happening as far as that goes, Yeah, but they started off even before Marcus Smart got hurt.

我想真的，這就是發生的事情，至於那件事，是的，但他們在馬庫斯-斯瑪特受傷之前就開始了。

They started off the season.

他們在賽季開始時。

We didn't like what we were seeing from Boston, um, at the very, very start of the season, and then we then we blamed the bubble.

我們不喜歡我們從波士頓看到的東西，嗯，在本賽季非常，非常開始，然後我們然後我們責怪保麗龍。

You know, we knew Kemble was out, but we blame the bubble and such a sure, you know, the season ends in September for them, and then they come back and they playing in December?

你知道，我們知道Kemble出局了，但我們責怪保麗龍和這樣的肯定，你知道，本賽季結束在九月的他們，然後他們回來，他們在十二月打？

No, no.

不，不。

Ah, whole bunch of other coaches don't get that Excuse Brad Stevens.

啊，一大堆其他的教練不明白，對不起布拉德-史蒂文斯。

Not gonna get it either, and I respect him.

也不會得到它，我尊重他。

I respect a lot of them.

我很尊敬他們。

Yeah, do it.

是啊，做到這一點。

Thanks for watching ESPN on YouTube for live streaming sports and premium content subscribed to ESPN, plus.

感謝在YouTube上觀看ESPN的體育直播和訂閱ESPN的優質內容，加。