One starter for the Bears?

熊隊的一個主力隊員？

Carson Wentz.

Carson Wentz.

Chicago Nets Never gets quarterback, right?

芝加哥網隊從來沒有得到四分衛，對吧？

My whole life, they've never gotten quarterback.

我這輩子，他們從來沒有得到過四分衛。

Right?

對吧？

The Bears.

熊隊。

So why start now?

那為什麼現在開始呢？

Carson Wentz will be the week one starter.

卡森-溫茨將是第一週的首發球員。

What the Bears air dealing with is an offensive line that is a hard time protecting the quarterback.

熊隊空前對付的是一個很難保護四分衛的進攻線。

So they like a guy who can throw down the field like Nick Foles.

所以他們喜歡一個像尼克-福爾斯那樣能在場上投籃的人。

But Nick Foles can't move around in that line.

但尼克-福爾斯不能在這條線上移動。

Can't protect them, so they need a guy who's mobile like mixed Robiskie.

不能保護他們，所以他們需要一個像混羅比斯基那樣機動性強的人。

But Robiskie can't throw it down the field.

但羅比斯基不能把它扔到場上。

Carson Wentz has shown that he is both mobile, and he has the ability he's shown in the past to throw it down the field, so he checks both boxes.

卡森-溫茨已經表明，他既是移動的，又有他過去表現出的在場上投籃的能力，所以他符合這兩個盒子。

In addition, John D.

此外，約翰D．

Filipo was his quarterbacks coach, whence his quarterbacks coach when he had his best best season in 2017.

菲利波是他的四分衛教練，當他在2017年迎來最好的最佳賽季時，他的四分衛教練。

Not only doing all the things I just mentioned but was great on the money down on third down, something he's been awful at recently, the worst in the league this season, and DeFilippo has reportedly said he thinks he can fix whence he has.

不僅做了我剛才提到的所有事情，而且在第三順位的錢上很好，他最近很糟糕，本賽季聯盟最糟糕的事情，據報道，德菲利波說他認為他可以解決什麼時候的問題。

He has to get in there and fix him.

他必須進去解決他。

I think other teams might be gun shy if they don't have a guy on the staff who is experienced with Wentz De Flip.

我想，如果其他球隊的工作人員中沒有一個對溫茨德翻有經驗的人，他們可能會槍打出頭鳥。

Oh, by the way, was once his quarterbacks coach in Philadelphia.

哦，對了，曾經是他在費城的四分衛教練。

He's been promoted.

他已經升職了。

Now he's the passing game coordinator in Chicago.

現在他是芝加哥的傳球協調人。

I think the connection is there.

我想聯繫是有的。

I think the need is there.

我覺得有這個必要。

I think the misguided way the Bears think about quarterbacks is there.

我認為熊隊對四分衛的思維方式存在誤區。

I think they're going to make a deal.

我想他們會達成協議的。

Can't see it happening.

看不到它的發生。

Max Kellerman, particularly of Nick Foles.

馬克斯-凱勒曼，尤其是尼克-福爾斯的。

This Nick Foles still there?

這個尼克-福爾斯還在嗎？

I mean, I don't recall correctly I might have, so I mean, it's amnesia.

我的意思是，我不記得正確 我可能有，所以我的意思是，它的失憶症。

It might be selected.

可能會被選中。

May not be, But is it Nick Foles?

可能不是，但是是尼克-福爾斯嗎？

Still, there isn't the form.

不過，還是沒有這個形式。

Isn't the guy that took Carson Wentz job?

不就是那個搶了卡森-溫茨工作的人嗎？

Isn't the one that ultimately capitalized on for Carson Wentz.

是不是最終為卡森-溫茨抓住了一個。

Injury guided them to the Super Bowl and had the Eagles locker room desire divided because half dudes in there wanted Nick Foles to be the quarterback.

傷病引導他們進入超級碗，讓老鷹隊的更衣室慾望分裂，因為那裡有一半帥哥希望尼克-福爾斯成為四分衛。

The other half.

另一半。

One of Carson Wentz.

卡森-溫茨之一。

Isn't that Nick Foles still in Chicago now?

那個尼克-福爾斯現在不是還在芝加哥嗎？

Last time I checked, so guess What?

我最後一次檢查，所以猜什麼？

I can't see the bears trying to move their problems, trying to move eagles.

我看不出熊想動他們的問題，想動老鷹。

Old problems from Philadelphia to Chicago.

從費城到芝加哥的老問題。

I don't see that.

我看不出這一點。

I don't see that with Maggie.

我不認為Maggie會這樣

I just don't see that happening.

我只是沒看到這種情況。

I don't see it because Nagy is is in a different situation with pacing those boys.

我看不出來，因為納吉是是在不同的情況下與那些男孩的節奏。

I don't see that happening.

我不認為會發生這種情況。

And I gotta tell you something about Mitra Drobinski.

我要告訴你一些關於Mitra Drobinski的事 And I gotta tell you something about Mitra Drobinski.

He threw eight interceptions last year, just like he did the season before.

去年他投出了8次攔截，就像前一個賽季一樣。

Threw for over 2000 yards.

投了2000多碼。

We get all of that completed a better percentage of his passes.

我們得到的都是完成了他的傳球的較好比例。

Then Nick Foles did this past season.

那麼尼克-福爾斯在過去的這個賽季。

I look at Ah Mitra Drabinsky.

我看著阿米特拉-德拉賓斯基。

And guess what?

你猜怎麼著？

Max is awful as we Aziz, we thought he was at times and as much faith as we lacked in Mitra Drobinski.

馬克斯是可怕的，因為我們阿齊茲，我們認為他有時和我們缺乏米特拉-德羅賓斯基一樣的信心。

Max, I don't think we ever talked about him as badly as we talked about Carson Wentz last season.

麥克斯 我覺得我們對他的談論從來沒有像上賽季對卡森-溫茨的談論那麼嚴重。

So why am I making that move?

那我為什麼要做這個動作呢？

Why am I thinking about Carson Wentz?

我為什麼會想到卡森-溫茨？

Come into Chicago instead of Mr Dubitsky?

來芝加哥代替Dubitsky先生？

If If they're gonna lose Mr Drabinsky, it ain't gonna be because of Carson Wentz.

如果他們要失去Drabinsky先生，那就不會是因為Carson Wentz。

I don't see it at all.

我一點也看不出來。

I don't see that at all.

我完全看不出這一點。

I see Mr Dubitsky staying right there in Chicago.

我看到Dubitsky先生呆在那裡在芝加哥。

I don't think they'd be able to get anybody else outside of Carson Wentz.

我覺得除了卡森-溫茨，他們找不到其他人了。

And I don't think you sacrifice Mitra Drabinsky on Throw him to the Wolves in favor.

我不認為你會犧牲Mitra Drabinsky，把他扔給狼隊。

Of course, it went to may very well be worse, particularly with your offensive line being questionable, to say the least, your running game.

當然，它去很可能會更糟糕，尤其是你的進攻線是有問題的，至少說，你的跑動。

Even though I like David Montgomery, your running game being suspect as well, I don't see that.

雖然我喜歡大衛-蒙哥馬利，但你的跑位也很可疑，我看不出。

I really don't.

我真的不知道

That's what I think.

我也是這麼想的。

The running games also an offensive line issue.

跑步也是進攻線的問題。

But, yeah, you and I agree about that.

但是，是的，你我都同意這一點。

I prefer to.

我寧願。

Biscuit went to The fact is, the Chicago Bears always get this wrong.

餅乾去了 事實上，芝加哥熊隊總是弄錯。

I think they'll get it wrong again.

我想他們又會弄錯。

And by the way, when you talk about the so called problems in Philly the last time whence unfolds, played together first they want a Super Bowl.

順便說一下，當你說到費城的所謂問題時，最後一次當展開，一起先打他們想要一個超級碗。

And then they did a damn good job trying to defend it.

然後他們做了一個該死的工作，試圖捍衛它。

Don't forget, they want a playoff game on the road against Chicago with foals, and then they went to New Orleans.

別忘了，他們要在客場對陣芝加哥的季後賽中與駒，然後他們去了新奧爾良。

Almost beat the Saints, right, so So I think that those two together actually have worked in the past.

差點就擊敗了聖徒，對吧，所以我覺得，這兩個人在一起，其實在過去是有作用的。

I don't know that that they could afford to have both of those guys on the same team right now.

我不知道他們現在能不能承受這兩個人在同一支球隊。

But I think that especially because of the D Filipo connection, there's going to be the belief in Chicago that he can fix Wentz and whence has Mobility X one.

但我認為，特別是由於D-菲利波的關係，芝加哥會有一種信念，認為他能解決溫茨，什麼時候有移動性X一。

It's not his mobile is think anybody's mobile and he has an arm.

這不是他的手機是認為任何人的手機，他有一個手臂。

How can you fix wins?

如何解決贏利問題？

But not because Mitchard's risk?

但不是因為米查德的風險？

Because Travis Keys never thrown it down the field.

因為特拉維斯-凱斯從來沒有把它扔到球場上。

That's really his problem.

這確實是他的問題。

I agree with you about Robiskie like his attitude is better.

我同意你對羅比斯基的看法，比如他的態度比較好。

He took his benching like a man didn't undermine.

他像個男人一樣，沒有破壞他的板凳。

The team didn't leak to the press on game day.

球隊在比賽當天並沒有向媒體洩露。

Undermining the quarterback.

破壞四分衛。

Was a trooper, by the way, got the job back and played better when he got the job back.

是個兵，對了，找回了工作，找回了工作就更好發揮了。

Good for him, and I would prefer him toe went.

對他有好處，我更希望他去。

But I think what they recognizes true Biscuit's floor is not is kind of low, and his ceiling isn't that high, whence his floor is low, but they look at him and think at least he has a high ceiling.

但是我覺得他們認可的真正的比斯基特的底線並不是就是那種低，他的上限也不是那麼高，什麼時候他的底線低了，但是他們看他，覺得至少他的上限很高。

And the last time that dude was his quarterbacks coach.

而上次那個傢伙是他的四分衛教練。

He hit it, so I think they're going to try to do that again.

他擊中了，所以我想他們會再試一次。

And, as you mentioned, Stephen A what are the options for Chicago right now?

正如你所說，Stephen A... ...現在芝加哥的選擇是什麼？

Really mention, Who else can they go get options?

真要提，他們還能去找誰要期權？

The option is to keep Babitsky, who's a better runner off the football than a Carson Wentz.

可以選擇留住巴比斯基，他是一個比卡森-溫茨更好的足球跑動者。

Last year was a better passer off the football than Carson was.

去年是比卡森更好的傳球手。

He went from completing 63% of his passes the year before.

他從前年的63%的傳球完成率。

Mr Strabinsky last year completed 67% of his passes.

去年斯特拉賓斯基先生完成了67%的傳球。

Let's put this.

我們把這個。

Let's let's let's pump the brakes a little bit when we could.

We condemning Chicago for picking Mitchell Dubitsky because they passed under Shawn Watson and Patrick Mahomes.

我們譴責芝加哥選擇了米切爾-杜比茨基，因為他們在肖恩-沃森和帕特里克-馬霍姆斯手下過關。

Not because he's worse than Carson Wentz Waas.

不是因為他比卡森-溫茨華斯差。

That's the difference.

這就是區別。