Parlor is the social media site and app popular with the American far right and claims over 12 million users.

Parlor是美國極右派流行的社交媒體網站和應用，號稱有超過1200萬用戶。

Citing its poor record of policing violent content, Amazon had given parlor the boot in light of the deadly January 6th riot at the US Capitol, effectively knocking it off line.

鑑於1月6日美國國會大廈發生的致命性騷亂，亞馬遜以其對暴力內容的不良記錄為由，曾給parlor開過罰單，有效地將其打下線。

That content included calls to assassinate prominent Democratic politicians, business executives and members of the media.

這些內容包括呼籲暗殺民主黨著名政客、企業高管和媒體成員。

U.

U.

S District Judge Barbara Rothstein refused to grant a preliminary injunction in parlors lawsuit.

S地區法官Barbara Rothstein拒絕在會客室訴訟中授予初步禁令。

That injunction would have required Amazon to restore what she called the quote abusive, violent content found on parlor.

該禁令將要求亞馬遜恢復她所說的報價辱罵、暴力的內容，在會客室發現。

The capital riots, she said, were a quote tragic reminder that inflammatory rhetoric can turn a lawful protest into a violent insurrection.

她說，首都騷亂是一個報價悲劇性的提醒，煽動性的言論可以將合法的抗議變成暴力的暴亂。

She added that it was unlikely to prove Amazon breached its contract or violated antitrust law by suspending the service.

她補充說，不太可能證明亞馬遜暫停服務違反了合同或違反了反壟斷法。

In a statement and Amazon spokeswoman welcomed the ruling, saying quote, This was not a case about free speech.

在一份聲明中，亞馬遜發言人對這一裁決表示歡迎，她說：引用，這不是一個關於言論自由的案件。

It was about a customer that consistently violated our terms of service.

這是關於一個始終違反我們服務條款的客戶。

Parlor has argued there was no evidence apart from anecdotes in the press that it had a role in inciting the capital riots that it was unfair to deprive millions of law abiding Americans.

帕洛爾認為，除了媒體上的傳聞外，沒有任何證據表明它在煽動首都騷亂中發揮了作用，剝奪數百萬守法的美國人是不公平的。

Ah platform for Free Speech Parlor was not immediately available for comment on Thursday's ruling.

啊平臺的言論自由客廳沒有立即對週四的裁決發表評論。