And then in on the passing on the passing front, you got Davante Adams and vowed that scandal ing and I just don't I'm a big fan of Davante Adams.

然後在傳球 在傳球方面， 你得到了達文特-亞當斯 併發誓，醜聞 ing，我只是不 我是一個大風扇的達文特-亞當斯。

But I just looked at Val there, Scantlin, and certainly, you know, the turnovers yesterday.

但我剛才看了瓦爾那裡，斯坎特林，當然，你知道，昨天的失誤。

Obviously, that hurt him a lot.

顯然，這對他的傷害很大。

I know it hurt.

我知道這很痛。

It's hard toe to commit those things, and he's a good player and these things kind of happen.

這是很難犯的事情，他是個好球員，這些事情都會發生。

But I think that when you're talking about competing for a Super Bowl championship, those two weapons you need to have more than them available to you, particularly when you don't have a running game and you don't have an elite defense.

但我認為，當你在談論爭奪超級碗冠軍的時候，這兩種武器你需要有比他們更多的武器供你使用，特別是當你沒有跑壘，沒有精英防守的時候。

You need Mawr than those guys.

你比那些人更需要Mawr。

When success in your team is predicated and Aaron Rodgers and that passing attack, this is not the days of Jordy Nelson with Randall Cobb and those boys.

當你的球隊成功的前提是和阿倫-羅傑斯和那個傳球攻擊，這不是喬迪-尼爾森與蘭德爾-科布和那些男孩的日子。

Vontae Adams can ball, but you need more than Valdez Scanlon as his sidekick.

馮塔-亞當斯能球，但你需要的不僅僅是瓦爾迪斯-斯坎倫作為他的搭檔。

You don't have that.

你沒有這個能力

You don't have much of a running game.

你沒有太多的跑動遊戲。

You got a defense that ranks 14th against the past 13th against the rush.

你得到的防守，對過去的13次衝鋒排名第14。

17th and yards allowed.

第17次和碼數允許。

I'm sorry in points allowed.

我很抱歉，在點允許。

Overall, I just looked at Green Bay and I say to myself, Excuse me yesterday was emblematic of what we're talking about here.

總的來說，我只是看著綠灣，我對自己說，對不起，昨天是我們在這裡談論的象徵。

They jump out to a 28 to 14 lead and then between the next two quarters in the second half.

他們以28比14領先，然後在下半場接下來的兩節之間。

And over time you put up a grand total off three points and really just had one good drive with Amber Rogers movie y'all down the field to tie it.

而隨著時間的推移，你把一個宏偉的總關三分，真的只是有一個很好的驅動器與安培羅傑斯電影你們都在場上打平。

That's who they are.

這就是他們的身份。

I don't think that's good enough to win.

我覺得這還不夠好，不可能贏。

The Super Bowl is good enough to make the play off Shore, and Aaron Rodgers always gives you a shot, but I don't think it's good enough to win it all.

超級碗已經足夠好了，可以讓你玩脫岸，阿倫-羅傑斯總是給你一個機會，但我不認為它足夠好，可以贏得所有。

I just don't I think they could win the Super Bowl.

我只是不... ...我認為他們不可能贏得超級碗。

They're not gonna be my favorites to come out of the NFC, but are they good enough to win it?

他們不會是我最喜歡的NFC球隊，但他們有足夠的實力贏得比賽嗎？

Sure, should.

當然，應該。

They have drafted Aaron Rodgers eventual replacement instead of pick up either another receiver to make to give Rodgers more weapons or a defense of peace that they need?

他們已經招募了阿倫-羅傑斯的最終替代者，而不是選擇另一個接班人，使給羅傑斯更多的武器或他們需要的和平的防禦？

Yeah, probably.

是的，可能是。

They should have done that.

他們應該這樣做。

We all said that at the time, but they didn't.

當時我們都這麼說，但他們沒有。

This is what they are right now.

這就是他們現在的情況。

What are they?

它們是什麼？

Are they good enough to win a Super Bowl?

他們有足夠的實力贏得超級碗嗎？

You know people.

你知道的人。

Oh, they're going to against teams with 500 records, guys.

哦，他們要對陣戰績500的球隊，夥計們。

They've played three good teams this season and they're one and two, and they're a fumble away from being, too.

他們本賽季打了三支好球隊，他們是一比二，他們也是一比一失誤。

And one, they're like the Bucks beat him up.

還有一個，他們就像籃網隊打他。

It was a bad matchup.

這是一場糟糕的比賽。

It was uncharacteristic of Aaron Rodgers and the Bucks have an elite defense.

這是阿倫-羅傑斯的不凡之處，而籃網的防守也很精良。

But the Packers beat the Saints early and again.

但包裝工卻早早的又擊敗了聖徒。

The Colts.

小馬隊

If we were to ask this question about the Colts, you know the answers might be different.

如果我們問這個關於小馬隊的問題，你知道答案可能會有所不同。

The culture one of the most well rounded teams.

文化最完善的團隊之一。

And look how Philip Rivers is playing right now.

看看菲利普-裡弗斯現在的表現。

Yeah, OK, but if not for a fumble, they beat the Colts yesterday and it's not you.

是啊，好吧，但如果不是因為一個失誤，他們昨天擊敗了小馬隊，這不是你。

Look at their schedule.

看看他們的時間表。

They don't have a very tough schedule coming up.

他們接下來的賽程並不艱難。

They should have a very good record.

他們應該有一個非常好的記錄。

It should put them in good position in the playoffs.

這應該會讓他們在季後賽中佔據有利位置。

They are.

他們是。

They are.

他們是。

Look, they have Aaron Rodgers.

你看，他們有亞倫羅傑斯。

They have what you just said.

他們有你剛才說的東西。

Stephen A.

Stephen A.

When you listed their defensive, um, standings in different rankings, they have about an average defense.

當你列出他們的防守，嗯，在不同的排名中，他們的防守大約是平均水平。

Three eyeball test says low average.

三眼測試說平均水平低。

But it's not like bottom three or four defense.

但它不像底層的三、四防。

It's not like the kind of defense that disqualifies you from winning a Super Bowl.

這不像那種防守，讓你失去贏得超級碗的資格。

So then it comes down to Can guys like Valdez gambling make plays when Aaron Rodgers needs them?

那麼接下來就要看像瓦爾德斯賭博這樣的人，能不能在阿倫-羅傑斯需要他們的時候發揮作用？

Thio?

Thio?

Well, he did fumble, but the bridge on his previous attempt.

好吧，他確實是失誤了，但他之前嘗試的橋。

He made a great play, so the answer is yes.

他的表現很出色，所以答案是肯定的。

They don't have a huge margin for error because of the defense, but they could absolutely win a Super Bowl.

因為防守的緣故，他們的失誤率並不高，但他們絕對可以贏得超級碗。

They're one of a handful of teams out of the NFC that you could say that about.

他們是NFC中少數可以這麼說的球隊之一。

Listen, no one has a chance to win the Super Bowl outside of Kansas City this year.

聽著，今年在堪薩斯城之外，沒有人有機會贏得超級碗。

Let's make that very clear.

讓我們把這一點說得很清楚。

Kansas City's writing this other Okay, if we remove Kansas City from the picture, the Packers absolutely have a chance.

堪薩斯城寫的是另一個 好吧，如果我們把堪薩斯城排除在外，包裝工絕對有機會。

But they won't because of their defense.

但他們不會，因為他們的防守。

Their offense is spectacular.

他們的進攻很精彩。

Matt LaFleur is one of the best play designer and play callers in the NFL.

馬特-拉弗勒是NFL最好的戰術設計者和戰術指揮者之一。

Rogers is completely comfortable.

羅傑斯是完全舒服的。

I disagree with everybody that they don't have a receiver outside of Davante Adams.

我不同意大家的說法，他們沒有一個接收器 外達文特・亞當斯。

Alan Lazar is a really important piece, but their defense continues to be the issue.

阿蘭-拉扎爾是一個非常重要的作品，但他們的防守仍然是問題。

And it's not only just the defensive players themselves.

而且不僅僅是防守球員本身。

It's also the defensive coordinator Mike Patton.

也就是防守協調員邁克-巴頓。

And that was the big kind of difference maker in yesterday's Game one defense for the Coats.

而這也是昨天第一場比賽中，大衣隊防守的一種大不同。

Matt ever looses their defensive coordinator.

馬特曾經失去了他們的防守協調員。

He made adjustments, and he was a big reason why that defense played a lot better and the Green Bay Packers defense didn't adjust in the second half.

他做出了調整，他是那個防守打得更好，而綠灣包裝工的防守在下半場沒有調整的重要原因。

They couldn't stop the run, and they couldn't get off the field against Philip Rivers.

他們無法阻止跑動，面對菲利普-裡弗斯，他們也無法下場。

And so in that moment, I go okay.

所以在那一刻，我走好了。

When you get to the back end of the season and into the playoffs, there's things that become difference makers.

當你到了賽季後半段，進入季後賽，有些事情就會成為改變命運的因素。

One of them is your quarterback.

其中一個是你的四分衛

Is your quarterback of difference maker Green Bay.

是你的四分衛的差異製造者綠灣。

Absolutely.

絕對的

Another one is your coach, and it's not just the head coach.

另外一個就是你的教練，而且不僅僅是主教練。

It's also the offensive and defensive coordinators.

也就是攻防協調人。

And while I think the coaching for Green Bay offensively is outstanding, I look at the defense and go, You got to stop playing so much dime defense, meaning six defensive backs on the field.

雖然我認為綠灣隊的進攻教練很出色，但我看了防守就會說，你不要再打那麼多的二角防守了，也就是說場上有六個防守後衛。

You've got to put bigger bodies.

你得把更大的身體。

When the offenses telling you I'm gonna run the football, you gotta put bigger bodies on the field to stop the run.

當進攻者告訴你我要跑動的時候 你得讓更大的人上場來阻止跑動。

And so, for those reasons, I go can go.

所以，基於這些原因，我去可以去。

Is the offense good enough to win a Super Bowl with Aaron Rodgers and Matt LaFleur?

阿倫-羅傑斯和馬特-拉弗勒爾的進攻足以贏得超級碗嗎？

Unquestionably, yes, is the defense?

毋庸置疑，是的，是防守？

Do I have any faith that defense can slow down?

我有信心防守能慢下來嗎？

Tampa Bay, Seattle, Arizona, whoever They're gonna face New Orleans.

坦帕灣，西雅圖，亞利桑那，不管是誰，他們都要面對新奧爾良。

No, I don't think that that defense is good enough.

不，我認為這種防守還不夠好。

And so that for for that reason, I say that the Packers can't win a Super Bowl.

所以出於這個原因，我說包裝工隊不可能贏得超級碗。

Well, do me a favor.

嗯，對我有利。

Don't take what I said part of it, and it's completely ignore the other part.

不要把我說的一部分，完全忽略了另一部分。

I don't recall letting their defense off the hook, led by Mike Pet, and I understand that they've got obviously some issues on the defensive side of the ball.

我不記得在邁克-佩特的帶領下讓他們的防守脫胎換骨，我明白他們在防守方面顯然有些問題。

Clearly, that's the case, But offensively, I'm not saying that Valdez scant Ling ah ah, Lazard and those brothers can't play.

很明顯，是這樣的，但是從進攻上來說，我不是說瓦爾德斯稀凌啊，拉扎德那些兄弟不能打。

I'm saying that when you're talking about competing this particular season for Super Bowl when you scour the NFC and you look at the Rams defense and you look at the playmaking ability of Russell Wilson on offense for Seattle.

我想說的是，當你在談論競爭這個特殊的賽季的超級碗時，當你在NFC中搜尋時，你看看公羊隊的防守，你看看西雅圖的拉塞爾威爾遜的進攻能力。

When you look at Tom Brady and Tampa and you don't anticipate that they're going tohave, you know they're gonna wet the bed the way they did against New Orleans a couple of weeks ago and you take into account the New Orleans Saints.

當你看到湯姆-布雷迪和坦帕，你沒有預料到他們會有，你知道他們會像幾周前對陣新奧爾良那樣尿床，你考慮到新奧爾良聖徒隊。

I'm saying that other than Davante Adams, you're gonna need other dudes to step up and be pretty damn close to elite toe offset Some of the things that the defense for the Green Bay Packers is going toe going to give you on a weekend week out basis.

我的意思是，除了達文特-亞當斯，你還需要其他花花公子站出來，成為相當該死的接近精英的腳趾偏移的一些事情，綠灣包裝工的防守將給你一個週末周的基礎。

That's what I'm saying, Dan, and that's why I don't believe that they they can win the Super Bowl or they can even get to the super pet.

這就是我要說的，丹，這就是為什麼我不相信他們他們能贏得超級碗，或者他們甚至能進入超級寵物。

That's my problem with it.

這就是我的問題所在。

Thanks for watching ESPN on YouTube for live streaming sports and premium content.

感謝您在YouTube上觀看ESPN的體育直播和優質內容。