Name: Stephen A. 與 Max 談論勇士隊以榜眼籤選中 James Wiseman | First Take (Stephen A. & Max react to the Warriors drafting James Wiseman No. 2 overall | First Take)
Uploaded: 2025-12-08T11:07:19.000Z
Duration: 7 min 11 s

情態副詞

obviously the Warriors finishing with the worst record in the N B.

顯然，勇士隊完成與N B的最差的記錄。

轉承詞

They take James Wiseman out of Memphis, Max.

他們把詹姆斯-維斯曼從孟菲斯帶走了，麥克斯。

All things considered, including what Jay just said.

所有的事情，包括周杰倫剛才說的。

No, it was the wrong choice, definitively the wrong choice.

不，這是錯誤的選擇，絕對是錯誤的選擇。

And by the way, Steve Kerr doesn't have to run a system.

順便說一下，史蒂夫-科爾不需要運行一個系統。

If he's a great coach and I believe he is, we'll be able to adapt.

如果他是一個偉大的教練，我相信他是，我們就能適應。

They could have a completely different style offense that fits the, you know, not try to fit a round peg in a square hole.

他們可以有一個完全不同的風格的進攻，適合，你知道，而不是試圖在一個方孔裡裝一個圓釘。

但現在你有了另一個善良的辦公室。

I'm not saying Wiseman won't be a very good player, at least the DeAndre Jordan type.

我並不是說威少不會成為一個很好的球員，至少是德安德烈-喬丹那種類型的。

Scouts think his floors, DeAndre Jordan, a hell of a player if that's you ain't gonna be any worse than that a hell of a player, right?

球探們認為他的樓層，德安德魯-喬丹，是個很好的球員，如果你是個很好的球員，你不會比他差，對嗎？

But there is a requisite amount of shooting you need in the modern MBA from distance.

但在現代MBA中，你需要的遠距離投籃是有必要量的。

See, I'm not saying they can't play another style.

你看，我不是說他們不能玩別的風格。

有史以來最偉大的射手，對嗎？

He'll shoot a lot of three is like a 33% shooter, and that's because he's made improvements.

他會投很多三分就像一個33%的射手，那是因為他已經做出了改進。

德拉蒙德的表現很糟糕，從三。

And that's playing on the Warriors, where he gets the spacing right.

而這是在勇士隊打球，他的間距是正確的。

Because where Steph and Clay launch from not all threes are created equal.

因為在斯蒂芬和克萊發射的地方，並不是所有的三分都是一樣的。

It gives the defense has to rotate from farther away.

這讓防守不得不從更遠的地方輪換。

所以德雷有更多時間 So Dre has more time.

And even with that shooting under, you know, three had one or two slip.

而即使是在這種射擊下，你知道，三有一兩個滑。

When Wiseman's not a shooter, Paschal is not a shooter.

當維斯曼不是射手的時候，帕斯卡不是射手。

You know, I'm so fascinated by I'm so fast.

你知道嗎，我對 "我這麼快 "很著迷。

I'm I'm so fascinated by you talking the basketball people like you know, more than us.

我... ...我對你說的那些籃球人很著迷... ...就像你知道的，比我們還多。

We watch the games, we know what the hell you talking about.

我們看比賽，我們知道你在說什麼。

When you look at the Western Conference, you not just look at the team we're talking about here.

當你看西部聯盟的時候，你不只是看我們這裡所說的球隊。

We got a look at some of the other teams of what they're expected to do or not expected to do.

我們看了一下其他隊伍的一些情況，他們應該做什麼或者不應該做什麼。

Portland was a question mark that came on strong in the bubble before the bubble.

波特蘭是一個問號，在保麗龍前強勢來襲。

We understand that New Orleans was a question mark.

我們知道，新奧爾良是一個問號。

I'm saying Take into account coaching, take into account experience, take into account marksmanship.

我說要考慮到教練，考慮到經驗，考慮到槍法。

The bottom line is Andrew Wiggins was no scrub if Jimmy Butler, conjoined Karl Anthony Towns and Andrew Wiggins and turn them into a playoff team from a perennial lottery team.

底線是安德魯-威金斯並不是擦邊球，如果吉米-巴特勒，將卡爾-安東尼-唐斯和安德魯-威金斯連體，並將他們從一支常年的樂透球隊變成一支季後賽球隊。

I think a healthy Steph Curry in that system being coached by Steve Kerr shooting the ball the way that he can shoot with Draymond not looking for him to shoot but defend rebound, pushing the ball up the floor, creating playmaking opportunities for other guys finally having a post presence because the damn show wasn't Joshua Whopper Jr or Andrew Bogut from years ago.

我認為一個健康的斯蒂芬-庫裡在那個體系中被史蒂夫-科爾指導著投籃，他可以用德拉蒙德的方式投籃，而不是找他投籃，而是防守籃板，把球推到地板上，為其他球員創造打球的機會，終於有了一個職位的存在，因為該死的表演不是幾年前的小約書亞-惠普或安德魯-博格特。

You take all of those things into consideration.

I'm talking about potentially squeezing into a playoff into a playoff.

我說的是有可能擠進季後賽進入季後賽。

But can we definitively definitively look here and go like this?

但是，我們能不能明確地確定地看這裡，然後這樣走？

All of those teams I mentioned, you know, for beyond a shadow of a doubt that they're going to step up and produce better than Golden State.

我提到的所有這些球隊，你知道的，因為毫無疑問，他們會比金州隊更上一層樓，產生更好的效果。

Can we definitively say Wiseman's the right choice?

我們能明確的說威斯曼是正確的選擇嗎？

But then Andrew Bogey, when it's a world championship with the Golden State Warriors.

但後來安德魯-博格西，當是和金州勇士的世界冠軍。

Wiseman will be a presence in the low post offensive.

維斯曼將是低位進攻中的一個存在。

I know that Bogey was great defensively as a rim protector.

我知道Bogey作為一個護框者，防守能力很強。

All I'm saying Stephen A is like Wiseman's not gonna be a guy that you throw the ball to on the block and say, Hey, go get me 20.

我想說的是Stephen A... ...就像Wiseman一樣... ...他不會是一個你把球扔給擋拆的人... ...然後說："嘿，去給我拿20塊錢

He's gonna be utilized in the continuity system that Steve Kerr has, which means he's gonna be on the perimeter.

他將會被利用在史蒂夫-科爾的連續性體系中，這意味著他將會出現在外圍。

And I guess that leads to a lot of questions, right?

我想這也會導致很多問題，對吧？

How do you play Draymond Green and Wiseman together?

德雷蒙德-格林和威少怎麼一起玩？

Because they're both kind of similar players.

因為他們都是那種類似的球員。

And then I hate talking about this, but it's been factual.

然後我討厭談論這個，但它一直是事實。

When Clay has not been on the court Is that when you don't have another playmaker to make life easy for Steph, that means that the ball has to being steps hands more because he has to be that playmaker.

當克萊一直不在球場上是，當你沒有另一個打手讓生活容易的斯蒂芬，這意味著球必須被步驟手更多，因為他必須是那個打手。

And when I've seen the ball being steps, hands more, the volume increases.

而當我看到球被步，手多了，體積就會增大。

I typically have seen him get hurt when he's being asked to do a lot more, because Clay has been able to relieve so much of that load.

我通常看到他受傷的時候，他被要求做更多的事情，因為克萊已經能夠減輕這麼多的負擔。

But they were not Jay, Listen, forgive me off course if guys get hurt, that changes that.

但他們不是周杰倫，聽著，原諒我當然如果男人受傷，那就改變了這一點。

I'm saying if Steph were healthy right now, he's healthy off course.

我是說如果斯蒂芬現在健康，他當然就健康了。

如果他受傷了，他們就會改變一切。

But if stuff stays healthy with the line of the present, you hold on.

但如果東西保持健康了現在的線，你就會堅持下去。