Name: 給 Lamar Jackson 大批 QB 薪水公平嗎？ | First Take (Is it fair to question giving Lamar Jackson big QB money? | First Take)
Uploaded: 2025-12-08T11:05:20.000Z
Duration: 7 min 11 s

現在進行式

Lamar is still playing on his rookie deal and is in line for a big contracts.

拉瑪爾還在打新秀合同，而且還能拿到大合同。

Um, questions whether his playoff failures will affect that R C back here with us.

嗯，問題是他的季後賽失敗是否會影響那個R C回到我們這裡。

未來簡單式

Is it fair to question giving Lamar Jackson big time quarterback money based on the playoff success?

基於季後賽的成功，質疑給拉馬爾-傑克遜大把的四分衛錢是否公平？

It is over a long term deal for several reasons.

這是在一個長期的交易，有幾個原因。

First of all, I was unsurprised that the Baltimore that the Ravens beat, uh, that the Ravens won and beat a good team.

首先，我對烏鴉隊擊敗的巴爾的摩，呃，烏鴉隊贏了，而且還擊敗了一支優秀的球隊，我並不感到驚訝。

My issue with Lamar Jackson has never been that he can't beat good teams.

我對拉馬爾-傑克遜的問題從來都不是他打不過好球隊。

He can, and he's done it many times throughout his career.

他可以，而且在他的職業生涯中，他已經做了很多次。

Already, let's not act like all the winds have come against oft opposition, and he only fails to produce when he faces a good defense where they know how to scheme.

已經，讓我們不要像所有的風已經來了反對奧夫特，他只有當他面對一個好的防守，他們知道如何計劃時才會失敗。

See, they're turning him into a passer and they have to play from behind.

你看，他們把他變成了一個傳球手，他們必須從後面打。

No, my beef with Lamar Jackson has always been my questions about him.

不，我對拉馬爾-傑克遜的不滿一直是我對他的質疑。

The big one means the team you really need to beat.

大的意味著你真正需要擊敗的球隊。

If you're the Ravens, you gotta beat the Steelers.

如果你是烏鴉隊，你必須打敗鋼人隊。

Not with their backup backup backup quarterback, but with Ben Roethlisberger.

不是和他們的備份後援四分衛，而是和本-羅斯伯格。

He lost the one game he played against Roethlisberger, and if you wanna win a Super Bowl, you gotta win in the playoffs.

他在對陣羅斯伯格的比賽中輸了一場，如果你想贏得超級碗，你就得在季後賽中獲勝。

He has one loss in his career, every other game in his career against 25 wins, one loss.

他的職業生涯中，每隔一場比賽對陣25勝1負。

I'm not surprised to beat a good team, and I'm not saying that he doesn't deserve big money guys.

擊敗一支優秀的球隊，我並不感到驚訝，我並不是說他不配擁有大款們。

But the way I would structural Lamar Jackson contract would resemble the kind of contract that that Prescott apparently wanted.

但我會結構拉馬爾-傑克遜合同的方式，會類似於普雷斯科特顯然想要的那種合同。

I'd even considered over paying him per year to keep it on a shorter deal.

我甚至考慮過給他多付年薪，讓其保持較短的合約。

When you're super athletically talented, sometimes you don't have to learn the same fundamental skills as some other, less talented players.

當你的運動天賦超強時，有時你不必像其他一些天賦較低的球員一樣學習基本技能。

That's why guys like Aaron Rodgers and Patrick Mahomes air like what?

這就是為什麼像阿倫-羅傑斯和帕特里克-馬霍姆斯這樣的人的空氣像什麼？

You have superhuman talent and you've got the skills right, like this happens in every sport, not just football.

你有超人的天賦，你有正確的技能，就像這種情況發生在每一項運動中，不僅僅是足球。

You have that kind of ability and you got the fundamentals down.

你有這樣的能力，而且你的基本功很好。

And so that could be an issue with super talented guys like Lamar Jackson.

所以這對拉馬爾-傑克遜這樣的超級天才來說可能是個問題。

That's 12 when you're like that as you age, you don't always tend to age great.

那是12歲的時候，當你這樣隨著年齡的增長，你並不總是傾向於偉大的年齡。

You know, sometimes that athletic ability allows you to settle in tow.

你知道，有時候，運動能力可以讓你安身立命。

Other cats are, you know, in their prime, and you can have a longer career.

其他的貓，你知道，在他們的黃金時期，你可以有一個更長的職業生涯。

But sometimes if you don't get that other stuff straight, you can experience a real fall off when the even you lose just a quarter step and it's hard to see.

但是有時候如果你不把其他的東西弄清楚，你就會經歷真正的落差，當偶你只輸了四分之一步，就很難看了。

There could be a good big fall off, and also, when you play out of the pocket a lot, there's a chance for injury.

可能會有好大的落差，而且，當你經常在口袋裡打球的時候，有可能會受傷。

Although I gotta say, Lamar Jackson's been remarkably, I'd say durable, considering how much he runs so far has not done would but right knock wood.

雖然我得說，拉瑪爾-傑克遜的表現非常出色，我想說的是，考慮到他到目前為止還沒有做多少事情，但正確的敲木頭。

But for all those issues, including, can he develop into the kind of pastor that can win Super Bowls?

但對於所有這些問題，包括，他能發展成那種能贏得超級碗的牧師嗎？

And can he do it against the teams he needs to most?

而他能做到對陣自己最需要的球隊嗎？

I would structure the deal for him guys the way some guys seem to want those deals, not the 10 year forever.

我會為他的傢伙構建交易的方式，有些人似乎想要這些交易，而不是10年的永遠。

Fine, but let's limit the length of the contract.

好吧，但讓我們限制合同的長度。

You don't wanna be invested in a guy like that for 10 years when you have all those variables that you still need answers to.

你不會想在這樣的人身上投資10年的，當你有所有這些變數，你仍然需要答案。

Means absolutely, positively nothing Max Kellerman because here's what it comes down to.

意味著絕對，絕對沒有什麼馬克斯-凱勒曼，因為這裡是它的歸宿。

The question was whether or not he gets his money or he deserves his money, not how many damn years he deserves them over.

問題是他是否能拿到錢，或者說他是否應該拿到錢，而不是他該死的應該讓他們過多少年。

Give it to him and three give it before you give it into 10.

The question is the money, not the number of years dollars.

And what I'm saying is, when it comes to the dollars, you damn well better give him his money when you pay Jared golf.

我想說的是，當涉及到錢的時候 你最好在給賈裡德打高爾夫的時候把錢給他

When you paid Carson Wentz when you just gave Ryan Tannehill some dough when you're paying all of these guys, you damn well better pay Jamal Lamar Jackson money.

當你付給卡森-溫茨的時候... ...當你付給萊恩-坦內希爾一些錢的時候... ...當你付給所有這些人的時候，你最好付給賈馬爾-拉馬爾-傑克遜錢。

Because of issues that you pointed out in the past.

Max, you know how you shrivel up your Hey, Molly Ryan.

麥克斯，你知道你是怎麼把你的嘿，莫利-萊恩萎縮的。

這對馬克斯-凱勒曼來說是怎樣的模仿？

25 5, and, Oh, by the way, take out the What is it?

25 5，還有，哦，對了，把那個什麼東西拿出來？

It's one loss against the Pittsburgh Steelers.

這是對匹茲堡鋼人隊的一次失敗。

How do you all like this imitation 20 father, That's what that's what he does, right?

你們都喜歡這個仿製的20號父親嗎，那就是他的工作，對嗎？

So how is it that we're gonna sit up there, make those facial expressions, recognizing his greatness against more than 97% of the league?

那麼，我們要怎麼坐在上面，做出這些表情，承認他對聯盟97%以上的人的偉大呢？

But then, because of the 3% we're gonna sit up there and shake him on and shake him on his money.

但是呢，因為那3%，我們要坐在上面搖他，搖他的錢。

The fact of the matter is Lamar Jackson, because of individuals who have gotten paid that haven't come close to his success, at least in the regular season.

事實是拉馬爾-傑克遜，因為個人得到的報酬還沒有接近他的成功，至少在常規賽。

Because once you get to the postseason, you got a chance, right?

因為一旦進入季後賽，你就有機會了，對吧？

He gives you a chance for the second consecutive year.

With him is the leading court with him leading the quarterback position.

有他在，就是以他為首的四分衛位置的領庭。

So the Baltimore Ravens, they have the number one rushing attack in the National Football League.

所以巴爾的摩烏鴉隊，他們擁有全美橄欖球聯盟第一的攻擊力。

Secondaries are petrified and their compromise because they gotta come.

二貨們都石化了，他們的妥協是因為他們得來。

They gotta keep spies around this brother because of his elusive ity, the ability to run the football and, as a result of that against everyone other than the elite two teams the Steelers, the Kansas City Chiefs, the Pittsburgh Steelers.

他們必須在這個兄弟身邊留有間諜，因為他的捉摸不定，跑動能力強，是以，除了鋼人隊、堪薩斯城酋長隊、匹茲堡鋼人隊這兩支精英球隊外，其他所有人都要對他進行監視。

Obviously, the bottom line is Lamar Jackson has done everything that you can ask to get his money, not a win Super Bowl stuff like that different thing.

很明顯，底線是拉馬爾-傑克遜已經做了一切你可以要求得到他的錢，而不是一個贏得超級碗的東西，比如說不同的東西。

But those other guys that got money didn't win any Super Bowls.

但其他那些拿到錢的人並沒有贏得任何超級碗。

That is kind of a shame that we have to talk about it, you know?

這是一種恥辱，我們必須談論它，你知道嗎？

That kinda like it pissed you off because if you start to think why, though, right, is it because he's exceedingly excellent against every other team?

這有點像讓你生氣了，因為如果你開始思考為什麼，不過，對吧，是因為他對其他球隊都超乎尋常的優秀嗎？

He hasn't won But then there's gonna be some dudes that get an opportunity to get their next deal, and we aren't gonna haggle about their money.

他還沒贏過 但會有一些人有機會得到下一份合約 我們不會為他們的錢討價還價。

We are going to discuss whether or not they should get their money and they don't go to playoff games or they have never won an M v.

我們要討論的是，他們是否應該拿錢，他們不去看季後賽，或者他們從未贏過M訴。

字幕列表影片播放

給 Lamar Jackson 大批 QB 薪水公平嗎？ | First Take (Is it fair to question giving Lamar Jackson big QB money? | First Take)

stuff

recognize

compromise

deserve