Nick Foles is not Aaron Rodgers.

尼克-福爾斯不是阿倫-羅傑斯。

Nick Foles is not gonna overcome your problems.

尼克-福爾斯是不會克服你的問題的。

That's not who he is if you have a terrible offensive line and he can't step into the pocket and he throws those 50 50 balls, which is part of his success, right?

這不是他是誰，如果你有一個糟糕的進攻線，他不能進入口袋，他投出那些50個50球，這是他成功的一部分，對嗎？

Like I believe in my receiver, give him a shot, even if it's an imperfectly thrown ball.

就像我相信我的接球者一樣，給他一個機會，哪怕是一個不完美的投球。

But instead of being able to step into a pocket, he has to throw off his back foot.

但他卻無法踏入口袋，只能從後腳投出。

That's not that's not for Nick Foles.

這不是那不是為尼克-福爾斯。

That's not like he's not a miracle man that way.

這樣一來，他又不是什麼奇蹟人物。

Um, Nick Foles is the kind of guy where, if you can if you have a competent offensive line and you have some weapons around him, he's not only not going to stop and you have a defense, he's not only not because there are a lot of quarterbacks who fit in this category if they have the right coaching and a good team, this quarterback won't stop them from succeeding, even if he's not the guy to bring them success.

嗯，尼克-福爾斯是那種，如果你可以，如果你有一個有能力的進攻線，你有一些武器在他身邊，他不僅不會停止，你有一個防守，他不僅不會，因為有很多四分衛誰適合在這個類別中，如果他們有正確的教練和一個好的團隊，這個四分衛不會阻止他們的成功，即使他不是給他們帶來成功的人。

I think Nick Foles is a level beyond that.

我認為尼克-福爾斯是一個層次的超越。

I think if you surround Nick Foles in the right with the right situation and offensive line, some weapons, a good defense, good coach, he's not only not going to stop you from having success, he can galvanize that team in the moment of truth, better than just a mid pack quarterback.

我認為，如果你在正確的情況下圍繞著尼克-福爾斯，有合適的情況和進攻線，一些武器，一個好的防守，好的教練，他不僅不會阻止你獲得成功，他可以在關鍵時刻激發這支球隊，比只是一箇中包四分衛更好。

My basic feeling about him is he's an average NFL starter, which is a good thing with an extra dimension to him, that where guys like to play with him, where he's not afraid of the big moment.

我對他的基本感覺是，他是一個普通的NFL主力球員，這是個好東西，有一個額外的維度，那就是哪裡的人喜歡和他一起打球，他不怕大勢所趨。

That's who I always thought he waas.

我一直以為他就是這樣的人。

And on this Chicago team, given the potential of their defense, the defense has played very well.

而在這支芝加哥隊身上，鑑於他們的防守潛力，防守表現非常好。

I think they have the potential to be even better.

我認為他們有潛力做得更好。

I thought something could happen, but what was exposed last week, Stephen A.

我以為會有什麼事情發生，但上週曝光的，斯蒂芬-A。

Is that the Bears offensive line just can't get it done now.

是不是熊隊的進攻線現在就是搞不定。

It was especially bad because they kept getting you know, they kept getting the ball in their own five yard line, basically, so without an offensive line, that's an especially bad problem.

這是特別糟糕的，因為他們不斷得到... ...你知道，他們不斷得到球 在自己的五碼線，基本上，所以沒有進攻線， 這是一個特別糟糕的問題。

But I think the Bears were exposed unimaginative play calling by Nagy.

但我認為熊隊被納吉暴露了毫無想象力的戰術指揮。

Not a lot of weapons and primarily a problem on the offensive line.

武器不多，主要是進攻線的問題。

Nick Foles ain't gonna overcome that.

尼克-福爾斯是不會克服這個問題的。

But if you can get some of those things fixed, Nick Foles can be a guy who could take you there.

但如果你能解決其中一些問題，尼克-福爾斯可以成為一個可以帶你到那裡的人。

Here's my problem.

這是我的問題。

You're not.

你不是

I can't definitively say you're wrong.

我不能肯定的說你錯了。

He's a Super Bowl champion.

他是超級碗冠軍。

We know what he did in Philadelphia when he won the Super Bowl.

我們知道他在費城贏得超級碗時做了什麼。

We know what he did the following year when Carson Wentz went down for a second consecutive time and he took them to the playoffs, beat Chicago and then ultimately lost, uh, to New Orleans in that divisional playoff game.

我們知道他在第二年做了什麼，當卡森-溫茨連續第二次倒下的時候，他把他們帶到了季後賽，擊敗了芝加哥，然後最終輸給了新奧爾良，呃，在那場分區季後賽中。

We've seen what Nick Foles could do, particularly when he has coaching.

我們已經看到了尼克-福爾斯的能力，特別是當他有教練的時候。

The question to me, Max is we don't bring up enough about the coaching of the Chicago Bears.

對我來說，馬克斯的問題是我們對芝加哥熊隊的教練提得不夠多。

Matt Nager.

馬特-納格

You gonna give a play caller?

你要給一個叫花子？

You're gonna give a play calling ability?

你要給一個指揮能力？

You gonna give a play calling responsibilities?

你要給一個戰術指揮的責任？

You're gonna let Bill Lazor coach Bill Lazor Should he really be calling plays?

你要讓比爾-拉佐執教比爾-拉佐 他真的應該指揮比賽嗎？

Should he be?

他應該是嗎？

That guy's the offensive coordinator.

那人是進攻協調員。

He had two years in Miami.

他在邁阿密待了兩年。

He wasn't stellar.

他不是明星。

He had two years in Cincinnati.

他在辛辛那提待了兩年。

He wasn't stellar.

他不是明星。

Okay, then he had a year's hiatus off before he comes in and takes over Chicago.

好吧，那麼他有一年的休息時間，然後他進來接管芝加哥。

I've never seen this man with a top 10 offense.

我從來沒有見過這個人有前十的攻擊力。

I'm looking at numbers from his rushing.

我看的是他的衝鋒陷陣的數據。

I'm sorry.

我很抱歉

From from, you know, rush into football, passing the football.

從，你知道，衝進足球，傳球。

He's hovering around the twenties, the teens and passing the twenties and Russian.

他在二十幾歲左右徘徊，十幾歲，過了二十幾歲，俄羅斯。

What does Chicago have now?

芝加哥現在有什麼？

They got divorced, rushing, attacking football.

他們離婚了，衝鋒陷陣，攻勢足球。

Led by David Montgomery.

由大衛-蒙哥馬利上司。

They got the 25th ranked passing attack.

他們得到了排名第25的傳球攻擊。

They've got the 27th overall offense.

他們的總攻擊力排在第27位。

Excuse me, and a lot of that may have to do with your offensive line because you can't block for to run.

對不起，這可能與你的進攻線有關 因為你不能阻擋你的跑動。

You can't protect for the past.

你不能為過去保護。

And you took a guy out of the line of images Dubitsky, who could at least run with the football, although we didn't trust his throwing.

而你把一個人從影像線中拿出來的杜比茨基，他至少可以帶著足球跑，雖然我們並不信任他的投籃。

So I look at it from that perspective and I say, What do we do?

所以我從這個角度看，我說，我們該怎麼辦？

Expect from Nick Foles, your play calling the suspect.

期待尼克-福爾斯，你的戰術叫人懷疑。

Your offensive line is suspect and you're running game.

你的進攻線和你的跑位都很可疑。

As a result, it's suspect and passing.

是以，它的疑點和經過。

It's really on you because we know Alan Robinson could play.

這真的要靠你，因為我們知道阿蘭-羅賓遜能打。

We know he could play.

我們知道他可以玩。

And so you see, you know Jimmy Graham and those boys could play as well.

所以你看，你知道吉米-格雷厄姆和那些男孩也可以玩。

We're just looking at it right now.

我們現在只是在看。

The fact that they're five and two, you got to give the head coach credit because of their defense.

事實上，他們是5和2，你必須給主教練的信用，因為他們的防守。

That's really about their defense is and Alan Robinson's a good receiver, but he's the only one who really is.

這真的是關於他們的防守是和阿蘭-羅賓遜是一個很好的接收器，但他是唯一一個真正的人。

The only one is a really good receiver, but you only have one good receiver.

唯一的一個是真正的好接盤俠，但你只有一個好接盤俠。

You gotta suspect running game.

你一定懷疑過跑動遊戲。

You got other suspect.

你有其他嫌疑人。

White House Jimmy Grant has had somewhat of a resurrection to some degree, at least a couple of games.

白宮吉米-格蘭特在一定程度上有了一定的復活，至少有幾場比賽。

They're five and two because their defense is answering the call, all sense of honor.

他們五二是因為他們的防守在應戰，所有的榮譽感。

And even though I think that Nick Foles is better than Mitra job, it's key.

儘管我認為尼克-福爾斯比米特拉工作更好，但這是關鍵。

Because of all of those problems, I think you might need a more more mobile quarterback.

因為這些問題，我覺得你可能需要一個更機動的四分衛。

Maybe, maybe, but and mixed Risky is very fast, but he doesn't throw the ball down the field like Nick Foles.

也許吧，也許吧，但是和混搭的里斯基速度非常快，但是他不像尼克-福爾斯那樣把球投到場上。

Not at all.

一點也不。

Here's the thing about Nick Foles like, really, you're asking who is Nick Foles?

關於尼克-福爾斯的事情是這樣的，真的，你要問尼克-福爾斯是誰？

Is he just a figment of our imagination?

難道他只是我們想象中的假象？

Kind of Look.

樣的看。

Nick Foles at Arizona was the second best quarterback in the Pac 12 to Andrew Luck.

尼克-福爾斯在亞利桑那州是Pac 12第二好的四分衛，僅次於安德魯-勒克。

He was better than Matt Barkley, who got more press because he was at S C.

他比馬特-巴克利好，後者因為在南加州，所以得到了更多的媒體。

He's better than Brock Osweiler, who got more press because he was so tall.

他比布洛克-奧斯威勒要好，後者因為個子太高而得到更多的媒體報道。

Right?

對吧？

But Nick Foles clearly better than those guys in college.

但尼克-福爾斯顯然比大學裡的那些人強。

He was second to Andrew Luck in the Pac 12.

他在Pac 12中僅次於Andrew Luck。

He turns pro with the Eagles he had as a quarterback and eight and two record.

他變成了老鷹隊的職業球員，他曾作為四分衛和八個和兩個記錄。

The year he went.

那年他去。

He threw 27 touchdowns, 22 interceptions under Chip Kelly.

他在奇普-凱利手下投出27次達陣，22次攔截。

That's a baller, right?

這是一個球星，對不對？

Like the Bollard Arizona baller with Chip Kelly.

像博拉德亞利桑那球星與奇普-凱利。

When he took over the Eagles, I thought they were dead in the water after Carson Wentz got hurt, took him to the Super Bowl, one Super Bowl M V P.

當他接手老鷹隊的時候，我以為他們在卡森-溫茨受傷後已經死了，帶著他去打超級碗，一個超級碗M V P。

When he took over the Eagles the following year, they were a 500 team.

當他第二年接手老鷹隊時，他們是一支500強球隊。

They were also kind of.

他們也是一種。

They were dead in the water for a different reason.

他們死在水裡的原因不同。

They weren't gonna make the playoffs under Nick Foles, they caught fire.

他們在尼克-福爾斯的帶領下沒能進入季後賽，他們著火了。

They made the playoffs.

他們進入了季後賽。

They beat this Bears defense at Soldier Field and then almost beat the Saints at New Orleans like yes, in those situations I'm describing.

他們在阿兵哥球場擊敗了這支熊隊的防守，然後在新奧爾良幾乎擊敗了聖徒隊，比如是的，在我描述的這些情況下。

He had the right set up.

他有正確的設置。

He's not a guy who's gonna overcome.

他不是一個會克服的人。

Ah, bad offensive lines.

啊，糟糕的進攻線。

We gotta look at the set up.

我們得看一下設置。

Are the Bears gonna win or are there better off with mitral Robiskie?

熊隊是會贏還是有二尖瓣羅比斯基更好？

Yeah.

是啊。

E can't throw the ball the ball down the field and listen to me.

E不能把球扔到球場上，聽我的。

A few weeks ago, I would have told you, Hell, no.

幾周前，我會告訴你，地獄，沒有。

But when we see ALS the problems that they have, you've got Nick Foles back.

但當我們看到ALS的問題，他們有，你已經得到了尼克-福爾斯回來。

There's a stationary target.

有一個固定的目標。

You can't protect them.

你無法保護他們。

Look at the play that they showed up Monday Night Football.

看看他們在週一晚間橄欖球賽中出現的戲碼。

Remember when Brian Greasy and Luis Riddick while highlighting to play on Monday Night Football?

還記得當布萊恩-格里塞和路易斯-裡迪克而強調在週一晚上的足球比賽？

When that rookie put a move on Jalen Ramsey, you had three offensive linemen or geared towards Aaron.

當那個新秀對杰倫-拉姆齊動手的時候，你有三個進攻前鋒或面向亞倫。

Donald, you're playing three on 24 But I'm just saying three guys.

唐納德，你在玩三對24，但我只是說三個人。

You got three on two on the defensive side coming at Nick Foles.

你在防守方有三對二的情況下，對著尼克-福爾斯。

He had to unleash the ball early, which, which is obviously why he overthrew the received because received hadn't even broken yet.

他不得不提前解圍，這，這顯然是他過掉接應的原因，因為接應還沒斷。

My point is, it's not him, but it's gonna be the personnel around you.

我的意思是，不是他的問題，而是你身邊的人員的問題。

And if you don't have help.

如果你沒有幫助。

Why have a stationary target where you don't have health?

為什麼要在沒有健康狀況的地方有一個固定的目標？

Okay, I I think that was a bad matchup against the Rams.

好吧，我覺得對公羊隊的比賽很糟糕。

Because of that, I agree with that and and and I punter who can keep pinning you back so, so deep.

正因為如此，我同意這一點，而我和我的打手們誰能一直把你夾在後面，那麼，那麼深。

But I think against most teams that they could do well enough to be in the game.

但我認為面對大多數球隊，他們可以做得很好，足以在比賽中。

And then I want Nick Foles under Central.

然後我想讓尼克-福爾斯在中央的上司下。

All right, so I have no reason to have faith still in Nick Foles.

好吧，所以我沒有理由還對尼克-福爾斯有信心。

Thanks for watching ESPN on YouTube for live streaming sports and premium content.

感謝您在YouTube上觀看ESPN的體育直播和優質內容。

Subscribe to ESPN, plus.

訂閱ESPN，加。