Name: RSA迷你。贏家通吃｜阿南德-吉里達拉達斯(Anand Giridharadas) (RSA Minimate: Winners Take All | Anand Giridharadas)
Uploaded: 2020-09-02T19:10:38.000Z
Duration: 4 min 55 s

分詞構句

I think the winners of our age knowing the inequality data, knowing from Oxfam that 82% of new wealth generated in 2017 went to the global 1% knowing all of that have been determined to help, to change, to make a difference.

我想我們這個時代的贏家知道不平等的數據，從樂施會知道2017年產生的82%的新財富都給了全球1%的人，知道這些都已經決心去幫助、去改變、去改變。

That's why you see, every banks got an impact investment fund.

所以你看，每個銀行都有一個影響投資基金。

Every Silicon Valley business claims it's a humanitarian project.

每個硅谷企業都聲稱自己是人道主義項目。

And yet what I think in general the winners of Orange are unwilling to, dio is get off the man's back that not willing to pay higher taxes or to stop avoiding.

然而我認為一般橙子的贏家是不願意的，迪奧是下車的人，不願意交更高的稅，或者是停止逃避。

They're not willing to let go of their double Dutch with higher sin, which taxman over they all use.

他們不願意放手，他們的雙荷蘭人與更高的罪，稅務員過來他們都用。

They're not willing to pay people more to do their jobs.

他們不願意付給人們更多的錢來做他們的工作。

They're not willing to stop lobbying, austerity and the kinds of public policies that we know are gonna hurt people.

他們不願意停止遊說、緊縮和那些我們知道會傷害人們的公共政策。

They're not willing to actually commit to the communities that have made them as as companies which they can now effortlessly abandoned by sourcing here and selling their what does it look like to imagine the kind of change that would involve the winners of our age stepping off that guy's back or being made to step off that guy's back win win sounds so great, right?

他們不願意真正致力於社區，使他們作為公司，他們現在可以毫不費力地放棄通過在這裡採購和銷售他們的什麼樣子想象那種變化，將涉及我們這個時代的贏家從那個傢伙的背上走下來，或者被使從那個傢伙的背上走下來贏贏聽起來很不錯，對嗎？

Because it's like taking one victory and then just doubling it.

因為這就像拿了一次勝利，然後就把它翻倍。

What could be wrong with doing well by doing good?

以善為本，做好事，能有什麼不好呢？

What could be wrong with all these kind of philanthropy?

The win win takes a situation, a concept that's actually derived from the world of trade.

贏贏採取的是一種形勢，這個概念其實是從貿易世界中衍生出來的。

Like you have ice cream, I have money, I want ice cream.

就像你有冰激凌，我有錢，我想吃冰激凌。

And in that narrow case that actually is a win win.

而在這種狹隘的情況下，這其實是一種勝利。

What has happened is that this concept of the win win has been kind of jammed into the sphere of social change and making the world better and actually solving our biggest public problems, where it has no business on ice cream.

發生的事情是，這種雙贏的概念已經有點被塞進了社會變革和讓世界變得更好的領域，實際上解決了我們最大的公共問題，它在冰激凌上沒有業務。

女權主義不是一個雙贏的問題。

A lot of men are gonna have to lose a lot of power and privilege and the right to grow people at the office and have positions that their mediocrity did not actually entitle them.

很多男人要失去很多權力和特權，以及在辦公室裡長人的權利，並擁有他們的平庸其實並不具備的職位。

當一切都在沙發上的時候，就是一個勝利的勝利。

What you are really saying is that the kinds of social change that actually costs the winners something are ruled out.

你真正的意思是，排除了那種真正讓贏家付出代價的社會變革。

What you're really saying is the best kind of solutions.

你真正要說的是最好的一種解決方案。

Don't ask anybody to get off anybody's back.

不要要求任何人從任何人身上下手。

What you're really saying is, yeah, tell women the problem is their posture.

你真正的意思是，是的，告訴女人的問題是她們的姿勢。

They should lean forward and raise their hand more that way.

他們應該向前傾，這樣多舉手。

We don't have to actually pay them equally because that would hurt shareholder value.

我們不必真的給他們同等的報酬，因為那會損害股東價值。

What you're really saying is yet let's have charter schools and, you know, let's have Mark Zuckerberg gives some money to a school because what you really don't want to do in the United States, I know this is alien.

你真正的意思是，然而讓我們有特許學校，你知道，讓馬克-扎克伯格給一些錢的學校，因為你真的不想在美國做什麼，我知道這是外來的。

Here is end the unbelievably barbaric system.

這裡是結束不可思議的野蠻制度。

We have a funding public education by your local property taxes.

我們的公共教育經費來自於你們當地的財產稅。

So basically, the nicer your house, the better the education you get in America.

所以基本上，你的房子越好，在美國的教育就越好。

So what the winners of our age do is get out in front of it by saying no.

所以我們這個時代的贏家做的是走在前面，說不。

No, I I recognize the desire for more equity in education system.

不，我... ...我認識到教育體系中更多公平的願望。

Let's not higher taxes, public education.

But let's do this new thing that they're promoting in Silicon Valley, where Silicon Valley companies pay for you to go to college and then you pay them a percentage of your income, which used to be called taxation but is now done, is an app only for the luckiest students with the highest likelihood of repayment.

但是我們做這個新的東西，他們在硅谷推廣的，硅谷的公司出錢讓你上大學，然後你按收入的一定比例付給他們，這在以前叫稅收，但是現在已經完成了，是一個只針對最幸運的學生，還款可能性最大的應用。

And so I believe that this win win thing, although it sounds so good, is actually part of the privatization of the solution of public problems.

所以我認為，這個雙贏的事情，雖然聽起來很美好，但實際上是解決公共問題的私有化的一部分。

I don't think all problems are need to be solved by the public.

我覺得不是所有的問題都需要公眾來解決。

But when you look at a problem like social mobility, like the empowerment of women, like what trade has done to communities in this country and the anger that it is aroused, those are the kinds of problems that cannot be solved by really clever businesses or really fun APS or rich people who happen to be feeling generous on a particular day.

但是，當你看到像社會流動性這樣的問題，像婦女賦權這樣的問題，像貿易對這個國家的社區所做的事情以及它所引起的憤怒，這些問題是無法通過真正聰明的企業或真正有趣的APS或有錢人碰巧在某一天感到慷慨來解決的。

 Those are the kind of problems we can only solve together, and those kinds of solutions have been discredited by the fantasy of the win win that allows the winners to keep standing on people's backs. 

那些是我們只能共同解決的問題，而那種解決方法已經被讓贏家繼續站在人們背上的贏家的幻想所否定。