what happened I'm by no means trying to stir up any more of it and

發生了什麼事，我絕不想挑起任何更多的它，

ultimately this is my fault I'm the one

歸根結底，這是我的錯，我的一個

responsible and the more time that passes the more and more I realized how wrong I was but a lot of people's

負責和傳遞越來越多，我意識到我是多麼錯誤，但很多人的的更多時間

outrage or uproar about it was pretty interesting maybe you saw this tweet but it's from Sean Vann -

憤怒或騷動約，那是相當有趣說不定您看見這條推文，但它從肖恩·范恩是 -

whatever - "We're filing a DMCA takedown of PewDiePie's Firewatch content and any future Campo Santo

不管是誰 - “我們正在申請PewDiePie的Firewatch內容的DMCA刪除任何未來的坎普聖多明各

games". Followed by "There is a bit of leeway you have to have with the internet when you wake up

遊戲“，其次是”有一點迴旋的餘地，你有你醒來的時候有一個與互聯網

every day and make video games there's also a breaking point". "I'm sick of this child getting more and more chances to make money off

每一天，讓視頻遊戲也有一個突破點。“”我已經厭倦了這個孩子越來越機會賺錢

what we make". For those who don't know a DMCA claim is

我們做。“對於那些不知道誰DMCA的要求是

basically a Copyright strike. Umm

基本上版權警告。烏姆

It's like a legal action towards your channel. It's a pretty big deal if I get more than three of them then - um -

這就像對你的通道法律行動。這是一個相當大的問題，如果我獲得超過他們三個人那麼 - 嗯 -

my channel will shut down. So you could say this is an attack on

我的通道將關閉。所以，你可以說這是一次攻擊

me, my livelihood. So it seemed more than just

我，我的生活。因此，它似乎不僅僅是

grandstanding. This seems more like an attack to me. Uh, he also followed with: "I urge other developers and will be reaching out

譁眾取寵。這似乎更像是一個攻擊我。呃，他也跟著著：“我敦促其他開發商，將被伸手

to folks much larger than us to cut him off from the content that has made him a millionaire".

伙計們比我們大很多，從已使他成為百萬富翁“的內容打斷了他。

So basically urging other people to do the same I don't know a lot of people aren't really sure about Let's Plays

所以基本上敦促其他人做同樣的我不知道有很多人真的不知道關於遊戲實況

It's sort of like a gray area in legal terms, because it's not like we owned the game. We don't own

這有點像在法律上的灰色地帶，因為它不是像我們所擁有的遊戲。我們沒有自己的

direct licence to it and I don't think technically we can sell

直接授權給它，我不認為在技術上我們可以賣

the video

視頻

with us in it and there hasn't really been a trial that tests this as well. There hasn't really been a trial that confirms

與我們在裡面有沒有真的已經過了這個測試，以及審判。目前還沒有真正得到它確認試驗

"Yes, Let's Plays are protected by fair use you can't do

“是的，我們的戲劇被合理使用你不能做保護

copyright takedown claims on them". But generally there hasn't been a case because developers

版權侵害他們“索賠，但一般沒有發生過因為開發商的情況下，

uh, benefit

呃，效益

massively from Let's Players or streamers this is pretty commonly known

大量從咱們的球員還是幡動，這是非常俗稱

eh,

誒，

Minecraft Is a billion dollar

我的世界是一個數十億美元

title because of streamers, largely because of streamers and YouTubers.

標題因為飄帶，飄帶因為YouTube用戶和很大程度上。

Same thing you know PUBG, I don't think It probably would not be even nearly as big without streamers and

你知道PUBG同樣的事情，我不認為它可能不會甚至幾乎沒有幡大和

developers know this. This is pretty commonly known and that's why even

開發商知道這一點。這是相當眾所周知，這就是為什麼即使

though, yes we are making money through your game it's still seen as something positive

但是，是的，我們通過遊戲賺錢，它仍然被認為是好的

but it is sort of interesting to me this case in particular because Sean's game is very much

但它是那種讓我感興趣的這種情況下，特別是因為肖恩的比賽非常多

probably the most linear game

可能是最線性遊戲

in question. You know, out of all games that could have been

有問題。要知道，出所有遊戲，本來是可以

talked about you know to me it's really interesting how

談到你知道對我來說真的很有趣如何

a game like Firewatch talks about this

像Firewatch遊戲這個會談

in a way like this because Firewatch Is an extremely linear game it's almost like a walking

在這樣的方式，因為Firewatch是一個非常線性的遊戲，它幾乎就像一個行走

simulator. It's not a bad game, I quite enjoyed it, but

模擬器。這不是一個糟糕的比賽，我很喜歡它，但

arguably if you play Call of Duty and someone else play Call of Duty you're gonna get a completely different experience

可以說，如果你玩使命職責和別人打打電話召喚你會得到完全不同的體驗

almost no matter what

幾乎無論什麼

but if you play Firewatch

但如果你玩Firewatch

you're probably gonna have the exact same experience no matter who plays it, so you could say "okay, well what's the difference between

你可能會具有完全相同的體驗，無論誰扮演它，所以你可以說“好，好什麼的區別

playing the game yourself rather than just watching someone else play it then" and ya, no, it's a fair point

打自己的比賽，而不是僅僅看別人玩，然後“雅，不，這是一個公平點

and I think especially with Firewatch in mind. Personally I think either way is wrong. You're bringing in more attention to the game. People

我認為尤其是Firewatch記在心裡。我個人認為無論哪種方式是錯誤的。你帶來更多的關注比賽。人

generally want to play the games themself almost no matter what. Even games that are pretty much just a

一般要幾乎不管什麼玩的遊戲自理。即使是遊戲，是非常簡單，只是一個

story base where you click through and read people want to play themselves and Firewatch compared to other walking simulators like the Walking Dead or

故事基礎，你通過點擊和閱讀的人想打自己和Firewatch相比其他行走模擬器像行屍走肉或

Life is Strange it doesn't really have choices that leads to different outcomes or different endings so it's it's it is very

生命是奇怪，並沒有真正有導致不同的結果或不同的結局選擇，所以這是它是非常

much on the line and I think there was some controversy as well with this game in the past because people

太多就行了，我覺得有一些爭議，以及在過去，因為人們這個遊戲

refunded the game because it was so short and

退還的遊戲，因為它是如此短，

they didn't like the ending and people were streaming it so they were just worried that people were just watching it instead of buying it

他們不喜歡的結局，人們都流，這樣他們只是擔心，人們只是看而不買它

So I think it's you know out of all people to come out of make a statement like this I think it's interesting that

所以我認為這是你知道的所有的人走出來的發言是這樣，我認為這是有趣的是，

this is the developer that did it. That's pretty much my point here "furthermore we're complicit and

這是做這件事的開發商。這幾乎是我的觀點在這裡“而且我們的同謀和

I'm sure we made money off the 5.7 million views that video has and that's something for us to think about". now

我敢肯定，我們賺了錢掉570萬觀點，即視頻已經和這件事情對於我們思考。“現在

Let's get into the meat of this

讓我們來看看這肉

Lot of people are saying I've seen a lot of tweets saying

好多人都在說我已經看到了很多的鳴叫說

they're not abusing Copyright laws Let's Plays because Let's Plays aren't fair use.

他們不濫用版權法讓我們的戲劇，因為咱們的戲劇是不公平的使用。

Get over it. I can't say for certainty that it is protected against fair use

克服它。我不能肯定地說，它是對合理使用的保護

but I'm fairly certain and most

但我敢肯定，最

legal expert's would say the same. There are some arguments against it but if you watch my video you know that I'm adding my

法律專家會說一樣的。有反對一些參數，但如果你看我的視頻，你知道，我加入我的

commentary to it I'm giving my insight to it whoever watches me play it is gonna experience it

解說吧，我給我的洞察力，這誰看我玩它是要去體驗吧

differently than anyone that plays it themselves. That's just how it is. There was an interesting article about this as well

不同於任何人都可以播放它自己。這只是它是如何。有關於這個有趣的文章，以及

saying "Having seen some of Pewdiepies Firewatch Let's Play video it

說：“我們已經看到一些Pewdiepies Firewatch讓我們玩視頻吧

definitely would appear to be protected by fair use. The fact that Vanaman directly and publicly admits that he's not

肯定會出現的合理使用進行保護。該Vanaman直接和公開承認，他是不是事實

taking the video down for any valid copyright reason but rather because he thinks Pewdiepie is a "propagator of

以視頻下來，而是因為他認為Pewdiepie任何有效的版權理由是“傳播的

despicable garbage" doesn't help Vaenaman's case at all,

卑鄙的垃圾“不利於Vaenaman的情況下，在所有的，

rather it gives Pewdiepie a lot more leverage to claim that any such take down would be abusive and possibly even a violation of

而它給Pewdiepie了更多槓桿聲稱任何這樣的取下來會濫用，甚至可能侵犯

DMCA's against misrepresentations.

DMCA反對虛假陳述。

I've also seen other legal experts

我也看到了其他法律專家

claiming that the video isn't protected by fair use Let's Plays aren't protected by fair use

聲稱該視頻不被合理使用遊戲實況保護不被合理使用保護

No one can really say for certain, that's why it's a gray area.

沒有人能真正肯定地說，這就是為什麼它是一個灰色地帶。

There are other legal experts saying that Let's Play's aren't legal "Firewatch DMCA's are

還有其他一些法律專家說，讓我們玩的是不合法的“Firewatch DMCA的是

legal dev's can easily destroy Youtube channel and the law isn't how you want it listen here". The thing though that a lot of people

法律Dev的可以輕易摧毀YouTube頻道和法律是不是你想要的這裡聽“的東西，雖然，很多人

pointed out shortly after these tweets were made

指出了這些微博被後不久

was that

是

they have a stream policy on their website. This is literally if you go to Firewatchgame.com/about.

他們在其網站上的流策略。這是字面上如果你去Firewatchgame.com/about。

It says "can I stream this game can I make money off of those streams?". "Yes.

它說：“我可以流這個遊戲，我可以賺錢了這些流的？”。 “是。

"we love that people stream and share their experience in the game. You are free to monetize your videos as well". So people

“我們愛的是人流，並分享他們在遊戲體驗。你可以自由通過視頻獲利的一樣。”所以人們

pointed this out but

指出這一點，但

there's still arguments against saying "it doesn't matter because Let's Plays still aren't fair use

還是有反對說：“這並不重要，因為遊戲實況仍然是不公平的使用參數

so they can do whatever they want". And I would - I would agree because basically Sean said he will

這樣他們就可以為所欲為“我會 - 我會同意，因為基本上肖恩說，他將

he will strike down any one of my future Let's Plays and the current the past one, but the thing is

他會擊倒我的未來讓我們的戲劇中的任何一個當前過去的一個，但事情是

that doesn't mean he can go back and revoke from the old one. Do you know what I'm saying?

這並不意味著他可以回去，並從舊的撤銷。你知道我在說什麼嗎？

Basically Sean has the right to strike any video that I upload from this point because he's publicly said that

基本上肖恩罷工，因為他公開表示，我從這個角度上載任何影片的權利

that's what he's gonna do but you can't retroactively let go and say you know what I'm revoking this license

這就是他就是該怎麼辦，但你不能追溯放手，說你知道我這吊銷許可證

because you are a racist garbage or whatever. That's not how DMCA work and I'm pretty sure

因為你是一個種族主義者垃圾或什麼的。這不是如何DMCA的工作，我敢肯定

that in that form of selection bias is not gonna hold up in court imagine if

在這種形式的選擇偏差的是不是要去抱在法庭上想像一下，如果

I made some

我做了一些

artwork and I told people "hey you're free to use his artwork go ahead everyone"

藝術品和我告訴人們：“嘿，你可以自由地使用他的作品繼續人人”

people start using the artwork and then I point to some people

人們開始使用的作品，然後我點了一些人

and I say "no" and file a copyright law

我說“不”，並提交版權法

dispute against that. Doesn't really add up does it? So regardless if

爭執對抗。並沒有真正加起來不是嗎？因此，不管

Let's Play is fair use or not this argument of claiming my video is incorrect. Most likely if my

讓我們玩是公平的使用或不使用這種說法，聲稱我的視頻是不正確的。最有可能的，如果我的

video gets striked I can't really do anything about it, Youtube really doesn't

視頻被刪除線我真的不能做任何事情，還真的Youtube不

they're sort of washing their hands around these copyright things, they kind of want

他們那種洗手圍繞這些版權的事情，他們有種想

to leave out of it, I mean they've been sued enough so it sort of makes sense. I imagine if a case like this toes to court then there's not gonna be much leverage for it.

離開了它，我的意思是，他們已經起訴了足夠因此它的排序是有道理的。我可以想像，如果這樣的腳趾打官司那麼就不會再有太大的影響力吧。

If anything it would be a huge waste of time and money for Sean and his developing team. When I saw these tweets I

如果有什麼將是一個巨大的時間和金錢浪費肖恩和他的團隊開發。當我看到這些我的鳴叫

immediately privatized the video out of respect for his request

立即私有化視頻出於尊重他的要求

but

但

my video got claimed anyway. They got the strike anyway, which is pretty disappointing

我的影片的觀眾，反正聲稱。他們得到了罷工，無論如何，這是相當令人失望

to be honest. As far as I'm concerned I didn't use any abusive language in this video.

老實說。就我而言，我沒有使用這個視頻的任何侮辱性的語言。

I didn't do anything that I think would be considered offensive. This video was uploaded as far as I know two years ago and I

我沒有做任何事情，我認為將被視為進攻。據該視頻被上傳，因為我兩年前知道，我

gotta say I'm pretty disappointed.

得說我很失望。

Also in people defending this that I know personally have had problem with DMCA request -

此外，在人捍衛這一點，我個人知道有問題DMCA要求 -

take down requests as well. Whether you like me or

取下來的請求也是如此。無論你喜歡我

Mr. Vanaman, these laws are made to for people to take down content and whenever there's power to do

Vanaman先生，這些法律為人們撤下內容製成，只要有權力做

so it's going to be abused and especially when the reason to take down the content has nothing to do with copyright

所以它會被濫用，尤其是當取下來的內容的原因無關與版權

it's

它的

it sort of shows that. I think these laws are important

它像是顯示。我認為，這些法律是重要的

for people, for artists to protect artists work and what they do and

人，藝術家，保護藝術家的作品和他們做什麼，

I think and that's why I think it's really dangerous to make these sort of claims and to do these sort of copyright claims for

我認為，這就是為什麼我認為這是非常危險的，使這些排序項權利要求並做這些類型的版權聲明對

no real valid reason, no matter what you think of me. If you have a problem with any content online or any video being up

沒有真正有效的理由，不管你怎麼看我的。如果你有任何內容的問題，在網上或任何視頻往上

you're are free to tweet me I will probably see it and

你可以自由地鳴叫我，我可能會看到它，

I will respect that request. I did get a

我會尊重這一請求。我沒有得到一個

request from another developer asking the same thing "hey can you delete this video" and I did and I wouldn't have any problem

從另一個開發者的請求，要求同樣的事情，“嘿，你可以刪除該視頻”，我沒有，我不會有任何問題

to have done the same with this video

已經做這個視頻相同

I have a huge amount of respect for developers and what they do. I know my

我尊重開發人員和他們做了什麼，數額巨大。我知道我的

work would not have been possible without them and

工作將是不可能沒有他們，

that's why I would never go against that. I could probably fight this in court and I would probably win

這就是為什麼我永遠不會去對抗。我大概可以在法庭上打這個，我可能會獲勝

but I decided to just delete the video and not waste everyone's time more about this.

但我決定只刪除該視頻，而不是浪費大家的時間更多關於這一點。

Like I said, this - everything about this was my fault the

就像我說的，這 - 的一切，這是我的錯

whole drama I'm the one starting it but I still think it's an interesting

整部劇我是一個開始，但我仍然認為這是一個有趣的

discussion to talk about and I think it's important that we don't abuse these laws because they exist to protect artists not to

討論談論，我認為我們是因為他們的存在，以保護藝術家不是不要濫用這些法律是非常重要的

make any form of censorship or

做任何形式的審查或

abusive claims. This video is not meant to attack Sean or his development team or anyone

濫用聲明。這段視頻並不意味著攻擊肖恩和他的開發團隊或任何人

I just think it's important to talk about these things. Like I said, I thought Firewatch was a really great game and

我只是覺得談論這些事情是很重要的。就像我說的，我還以為是Firewatch一個真正偉大的比賽，

I wish him all the best in the future with their next title.

我祝愿他在未來一切順利與他們的下一個標題。