Name: [1014] 不，布林克斯沒有修復他們的密碼鎖缺陷! ([1014] No, Brinks Did NOT Fix Their Combination Lock Flaw!)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T10:31:39.000Z
Duration: 1 min 44 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

情態副詞

This is the lock picking lawyer, and recently, in video 1009 I featured three types of Brinks padlocks with what I believe to be inexcusable design flaws.

And one of them was this four digit combination lock, which can literally be bypassed faster than you can dial the combination.

程度副詞

Let me show you just how easy it ISS it's currently locked.

I'm going to take a thin shim of metal, slip it between the lock body and a code wheel, then push it all the way to the back.

Press down on the shackle down on the XM and it pops right open.

Well, a number of you pointed out in the comments that Brings is now offering a similar looking path lock with a different mechanism.

And they said, it's not subject to this attack, folks.

This is the newer style padlock, and you can see externally they look a little bit different.

However internally, the mechanism is very similar, and unfortunately, that means the exact same bypassed works on it.

Once again, we will slip a thin shim of metal between the lock body and a code wheel.

Press down on the shackle down on the XM and it pops open.

Slipped this in between the lock body and a code wheel.

Press down on the shackle down on the XM and it is open.

So as you can see, the newer Brinks model is Justus flawed as the old one and should definitely be avoided.

In any case, that's all I have for you today.

If you do have any questions or comments about this, please put them below you like this video and would like to see more like it.

字幕列表影片播放

[1014] 不，布林克斯沒有修復他們的密碼鎖缺陷! ([1014] No, Brinks Did NOT Fix Their Combination Lock Flaw!)

literally

subscribe

exact

combination