Now this is the ice 7 26 100 non K.

It's the baby brother of the naturally over clickable K variant of the chip with the same name and as such isn't as popular.

So is it still worth it?

Well, if you don't care about the overcooking, don't mind the slightly weaker, integrated HD 2000 graphics Onda trying to stick to a tighter budget It may just be for you.

The realization that this was eight years old certainly hit me hard today, but I thought I'd give this a chance to show you why or why not.

It might still be worth considering for all of you Badri orientated system builders out there.

This is the eight year old CPU versus eight Triple eight titles.

So I don't want to spend too long on this as we did briefly check out the ice 7 26 100 k last year.

But because of the continuing price decline of these older 11 55 chips, I thought it was worth seeing how the 2600 dead when paired with their GTX 10 70 a Jew Pierre that's also still dropping in price.

Thanks, Tyne videos.

More recent releases.

The sort of thing I was looking out for today was whether or not the process of maxed out at 100% usage in any of these games, you know, did it hold back this GPU at all?

Or did it struggle in today's modern titles?

I've come across a few arguments online regarding whether or not four cause are still enough or whether six core processes of the new quad core, so to speak, in my opinion, quote cause are still fine, especially ones with eight threads like this one.

There were a couple of instances in the first game tested today Assassin's creed, or to see where the CPU usage did shoot up to 100% and stay there for a couple of seconds.

But I've noticed that this happens in the same spot in the benchmark with my eye 5 84 100 rising 5 1600 So it's just a game thing.

The previous assessing screen entry also played havoc on some quad core CPI use.

Aside from that, as I continue to roll the benchmarks on screen here, you'll notice how the eye seven actually seems like a very good pairing for the 10 70.

Sure, a new receiver, you will mean a high frame rate in some cases, but for a solid 10 80 p 60 f.

P s experience, the I 7 26 100 will still suffice.

This is what I also mentioned yesterday in regards to the 11 55 platforms a hole.

It's a platform whereby a lot of bargains can be found and an ideal hunting ground for anyone searching for decent price to performance.

Not to mention if any of you have a pre bill 11 55 machine off, which there are certainly many off about.

On places like eBay, for example, a process of like this would make an ideal dropping upgrade is the K version of the chip.

While it will still probably work, won't be of any benefit, as you probably couldn't make use of the overcooking potential on a cheap.

I am bold.

I do think that if you're building a cheat gaming system from scratch and want to use on our seven, then yes, the 2600 k will be the better choice.

If you plan to get more expensive motherboard as it can be overcooked to, say 4.5 gigahertz with relative ease and keep up with a lot of newer chips.

But if you don't have a decent board or you need to upgrade that aging eye 3 2120 in your O am dare war HP, a 26 100 will still transform that machine.

And that's why it deserves recognition in its own rights, despite its bigger brother getting the majority of the attention on.

With all that said, we've come to the end of the video, I hope you enjoyed it.

If you run with one of these are sevens in your system the 2600 all the 2600 k.

Let me know in the comments below, let me know how well it's doing for you and what graphics card you have it paired with lever like on this video.

If you enjoyed it, leave it dislike.