B1 中級 47 分類 收藏
開始影片後,點擊或框選字幕可以立即查詢單字
字庫載入中…
回報字幕錯誤
The idea that certain things, events or people can “cause” other things to happen plays
a huge role in human life.
We constantly desire to know “why” things happen, in science, love, sports, philosophy,
and so on.
But because the underlying laws of physics don’t care about the direction of time,
cause and effect don’t have the same meaning at a fundamental level.
It’s not that anything goes.
The basic constituents of the universe -- the particles and forces of modern physics -- behave
in predictable ways according to the laws of nature.
In principle, you can just as easily know their past paths as their future ones.
The current momentum and position of a particle determine its movement forward in the next
second, but they also determine how it was moving in the previous second.
Neither is really a “cause” preceding an “effect”, there’s just a pattern
that particles follow.
Kind of like how the integer after 42 is 43, and the integer before it is 41, but 42 doesn’t
“cause” 41 or 43 – there’s just a pattern traced out by those numbers.
At a fundamental, microscopic level, all we can say is that there are patterns between
events.
The macroscopic, human-scale concepts of cause and effect only emerge when you have larger
collections of particles, like humans!
As we know, time does have a direction for larger-scale systems, and we can indeed talk
about a spark causing oxygen and hydrogen to turn into water and an explosion.
“Spark plus oxygen plus hydrogen” and then “water plus explosion” is a sequence
the universe follows, and it only happens in one direction.
You never see a reverse explosion where water spontaneously splits into oxygen and hydrogen
gas and then at the very end emits a little spark.
One way of thinking about causes is that the tiny spark has great “leverage” over the
future.
If you hadn’t lit the spark, we wouldn’t have seen a giant explosion.
It doesn’t work the other way: removing or changing a tiny part of the giant explosion
doesn’t imply that there wasn’t a preceding spark.
When a small change to the present implies a big change to the future, the small thing
we’re changing is generally thought of as a “cause”.
Leverage can also go the other way.
Take this new pencil: the wood it’s made of contains trace amounts of radioactive carbon-14,
created by nuclear bomb testing.
If the pencil didn’t contain that carbon-14, that would imply that no nuclear bombs had
been detonated in the last 80 years; while if you removed a pencil-sized amount of one
of the atomic bombs, this pencil would still be basically the same.
In this case, the fact that the pencil has lots of carbon 14 means that it has a lot
of “leverage” over the past.
Instead of calling the carbon 14 in this pencil a “cause” of the earlier detonation of
hundreds of nuclear bombs, we call it a “record” of the bombs.
In general, when a small change to the present would imply a big change to the past, the
small thing we’re changing is thought of as a “record” or a “memory”.
So the distinctions between “cause” and “effect”, “records” and “predictions”,
aren’t fundamental to underlying physics – they only really make sense on the large
scale, because of the direction of time.
提示:點選文章或是影片下面的字幕單字,可以直接快速翻譯喔!

載入中…

Do Cause and Effect Really Exist? (Big Picture Ep. 2/5)

47 分類 收藏
林宜悉 發佈於 2020 年 3 月 28 日
看更多推薦影片
  1. 1. 單字查詢

    在字幕上選取單字即可即時查詢單字喔!

  2. 2. 單句重複播放

    可重複聽取一句單句,加強聽力!

  3. 3. 使用快速鍵

    使用影片快速鍵,讓學習更有效率!

  4. 4. 關閉語言字幕

    進階版練習可關閉字幕純聽英文哦!

  5. 5. 內嵌播放器

    可以將英文字幕學習播放器內嵌到部落格等地方喔

  6. 6. 展開播放器

    可隱藏右方全文及字典欄位,觀看影片更舒適!

  1. 英文聽力測驗

    挑戰字幕英文聽力測驗!

  1. 點擊展開筆記本讓你看的更舒服

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔