Name: 2019年你該不該買3GB的GTX 1060？ (Should You Buy a 3GB GTX 1060 In 2019?)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T09:49:43.000Z
Duration: 10 min 17 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

so we don't And, uh and I were reviewing this stock.

轉承詞

However, what are welcome to another video.

When the three gig 10 61st launched, some suggested that it shouldn't have even been called a 10 60 because not only did it feature half the V Iran, but it also had 10% less Cuda course than it's bigger.

Now, I actually quite liked the three Give 10 60 I had one in my system for quite some time.

80 p gaming, it did a pretty respectable job.

And considering I was on a tighter budget and I could have the three D version for £50 less, I thought, Why not go for it?

And I was pretty pleased with my decision.

Today, though, I want to ask the question is one of the's still worth buying on DDE?

Well, let's give this thing center stage today.

Talk about how it handle some Triple eight titles and then discuss what other options you may want to consider.

If you're shopping around at this sort of price point without further ado, then let's get into it and see how the three get.

60 handles itself in July, August 2000 and 90.

So this three gig P N Y card features 1152 coup because the clock speed of 1506 megahertz and requires 16 pin connector is very quiet, considering, as just one fan and exhibits no wine under load, I pay just over £110 used.

And that's not really a particularly unusual price.

The three gig 10 60 just isn't as popular as the six gig version.

The cheapest three D card was £40 less than the cheapest six get card on eBay UK.

If that price difference doesn't deter you, then stop watching and just get the 60 10 60.

You could probably expect to pay even less in an auction.

But first, let's see what it can do on its own.

We won't be focusing on comparisons just yet.

10 80 p is the best suited resolution for this hardware.

And so that's what I've stuck with throughout.

Let's kick things off with Assassin's Creed Odyssey, probably the most demanding game out of today's tested ones.

I'm using an eye 5 84 100 along with 16 gigs of 3200 megahertz memory for Assassin's Creed.

Obviously, I left things at the high preset the settings that were pre applied by the game and left everything else as it waas.

I made no adjustments to the resolution scale Auntie a leasing or V sink settings as I fired up the benchmark test and run it a total of five times, combining the scores and taking an average from said results.

Keep your eyes on the V Room usage in the top left as well as we make our way through all of today's tests.

The GPU use each pretty much hit 99% throughout all off today's game play results, meaning the card is exhibiting its full potential.

In Odyssey, we saw an average of 56 frames per second.

The 1% low figure of 19 meant some stutter did occur.

As we move on to Battlefield five, I opted for the high settings yet again.

But I was using direct X 11 mode as I seem to see a couple more frames.

By doing so, this is graphics card dependant, though on results may vary across different hardware with the high presets in a teepee with 100% resolution scaling we saw on average for memory of over 70 f.

A very nice result here as we made our way up this hill as this is real world gameplay, things may change depending on the level you're playing.

But hitting at least 60 shouldn't be a problem for the three gig 10 60 throughout the 1% in 10.1% lows were also pretty solid on there were no noticeable frame drops.

Even as the action started to heat up, I found that Battlefield five does tend to be pretty well optimized for a wide range of hardware.

Don't really to also gave us a solid performance with this card averaging 60 FBS overall during this time, try run, just like in Battlefield five.

We saw some very nice 1% and 10.1% lows to go along with the average, and you shouldn't have any problems here.

I don't know about you, but I find the cars to be quite hard to control in this one.

But nonetheless, it's still a fun one to play.

Performance may differ from track to track, but I don't think there'll be any major differences.

The three gig 10 60 seems to be doing okay, but again, keep your eye on that V room usage in the top left as we continue to move through the benchmarks.

Despite the pretty decent averaging far cry nude on the 600.1% time did suffer.

P s during the benchmark run, but there were a couple of micro stutters.

The game looks and runs great most of the time, and I run around the open world a little bit afterwards just to see how things compared there.

It seems like there were less stutters because the action packed moments were fewer and further between.

Unlike the benchmark around, that packs a lot into one place rage to still allowed us to run about, or guns blazing without much in the way of slow down again.

It was the high priest sit here and I have to say that although we weren't hitting 60 F b s, the game played pretty well in terms of consistency.

There was no real started to speak off, but I definitely advise medium to try and hit a better average if I'm honest.

Overall, though well, I was quite surprised it did this well as I have had mixed experiences with rage.

Sometimes it does well, one hardware you don't expect it to and vice versa.

But it's a pretty fun game and definitely worth a try.

So just look ups and benchmarks of your card before buying.

Also, it doesn't work on Jul core CPI use from my experience anyway.

Finally, and Fortnight, which has seen a season update, we were able to run the game of epic to see a plus 60 f.

It's a solid result, but dropping things the high might make those percentile figures a little better.

But what about in comparison to the six get card?

How does the beefy aversion compare results wise?

So everything we see on screen here, well, I've thrown some comparative figures up on screen for you.

As you can see, the results weren't two different as faras averages were concerned, but the extra V ran might help eliminate a few of those stutters in some cases.

And I guess the results totally vary from game to game.

So that is the three Geek G text 10 60 a card that can still handle itself fairly well a 10 80 p and in some instances provide you with a smooth 60 frames per second gaming experience, especially if you're willing to turn those settings down a little bit.

In some cases, though, you might find yourself wishing for an extra gig of the Ram, and that's where something like Am These are x 5 70 may come in handy.

In fact, I think you can probably find a few Rx five seventies here in the UK, at least for around 110 £120 which is about the same price I paid for this 10 60.

So that's something to bear in mind as well There's also a lot of six gig 10 sixties on places like eBay for not that much more money.

And I think if you have the budget to stretch to it, then that would be a no brainer.

Of course, it's also worth remembering the processing power, regardless of the V.

Aram 10 60 is a few years old now, and as we move forward in this world of very demanding games, you may start to see its struggle regardless of the amount of memory it actually has.

Now, it still seems to be a pretty decent budget.

Anyone working with a slightly tighter budget, they still seem to be pretty plentiful on the used to market as well.

Well, it's a tough one, really, because it totally depends on the price that you pay for it.

I think for a 10 80 Pete Gaming card with very little outlay in terms of money, then it does a pretty decent job, but you may find yourself wishing you purchase that six get card.

If you start to see if you start, is here and there.

I do think, though, that some of the hate toward the card is unwarranted, considering you can still hold its own to some degree.

But it may not be the wisest purchase decision right now.