Now what we have here is an Intel core.

I 360 100 process er popular among budget builders in 2015 this CPU features to cause for threads and integrated HD 5 30 graphics.

I wish I could say that it represents great value for money in 2020 but here in the UK, at least it's still retail.

Was used for about £50 which is more than you could find a secondhand and closely performing rise in 3 1204 We're off to a great start.

So does this hyper threaded draw corps have what it takes?

The handle Games in 2020 on Dhe.

Should you buy one?

Let's talk about the full set up alongside the 3.7 gigahertz sick Jenna Sky.

Like I three, we have a cheap gigabyte h 1 10 d three.

A motherboard intended for miners.

They can be picked up for a very reasonable price these days and a perfectly suitable for an entry level gaming build.

To go with these two.

We have an Arctic Alpine 12 cooler, which is a very cheap after market solution on perfect for when you buy a secondhand process at that doesn't come with in Intel Stock one, a seemingly common occurrence.

Finally, we also have the usual suspects, the radio on 5700 X t and 16 gigs of DDR four, which in this case will be limited to 2133 megahertz, while the 5700 x t should not be paired with the eye 3 61 100 In the real world, it does mean that the process will be able to reach its maximum potential and show us what it's really capable off.

Unfortunately, I had to reinstall everything on my PC not long ago, including the operating system.

So I'm slowly building my games collection.

Back up, Andi, even adding some more into the mix.

I've got six tantalizing titles to check out in today's video, so let's kick things off with Fallout.

Four is an older game, but it's one that released in the same year as the eye 3 61 100 So where better place to start than here?

The game is Captain 60 F.

P.

S, and this is for the sake of the game engine, which may exhibit strange behavior otherwise So this first benchmark was more about seeing how well the CPU helped maintain a solid average on whether or not it can keep us close to or on the capped figure.

Annoyingly 59 f.

P.

S was the average, which I suppose we'll have to do seriously.

It feels great, and there are a couple of dips here and there.

Don't get me wrong, but you'll notice from the figures in the top left corner that the CPU isn't really struggling much at all.

On back in 2015 this was an ideal chip for tackling the vast open world.

That Fallout four takes place in another example of a game that runs just fine is counterstrike global offensive, which is more popular than ever and definitely worth a place in the benchmark line up its CPU intensive.

But despite this, the eye three handles it just fine.

At 10 80 p.

I tend to run this at the lowest settings ever since a few of you said that this is how you play.

And by doing this, we saw just shy of 120 frames per second.

The footage that I recorded is from about match so as not to hinder my teammates by focusing more on recording than actually playing.

But the frame rate test was performed during a match on dust to using frappes.

The far cry five results seem great at first, and according to the benchmark, we were averaging a cheeky 69 F.

B s a 10 80 p normal.

But when it came to actual gameplay, this average was closer to 50 in busier or built up areas.

So I've put the gameplay average on screen instead of the benchmark figure.

And here you can also see that the CPU is being put under some serious strain.

It is remaining very cool, which is nice to see those.

So our Arctic 12 caller seems to be doing a great job.

It's also very quiet.

I know this isn't a cooler review, but this one does seem to be quite good, which I wasn't expecting.

I bought it because it cost me a fiver on Amazon with same day delivery on the surface player unknowns, Battle grounds seems to run okay with a decent looking frame rate on screen, right?

Well, the trouble is that the process, er again seems to be having a pretty hard time and in turn will see some dips here in there, which can really be off putting.

The average came in over 60 f.

P s, but the 1% in 10.1% lows do leave something to be desired.

I'll have to see how other sky like CP use their these days at some point.

Because, as I recall, I haven't had much experience with the eye fives or by sevens from this architectural, if any.

They seem pretty boring to me at the time they came out.

If I'm honest and it seems they are now overpriced in a lot of places, at least here in the UK, so that's probably why I haven't really checked them out.

Okay, so next up, it's my current favorite gained the outer worlds because I'm an absolute genius.

I accidentally left the M s.

I overlay over the HUD in the top left corner, so it is a bit of a mess, but hopefully you can still make everything else.

The CPU does reach 100% usage at some points, usually when there are a few enemies on screen or when we approach a new area, but I tend to notice stutter a lot of the time here anyway, unless we kept the game.

The different locations will also have different impacts on the frame rate, which could apply to any game.

But the difference between towns and not towns seems quite noticeable, especially here.

So bear that in mind.

If you want to pick this up, I have it on game pass for PC, which, honestly, is the service seems really good so far, even if the M S store isn't without its issues, Okay, so now it's red dead redemption to I ran the in game benchmark, which takes place across a few different environments, and the average turned out to be spot on 60.

This was with the first balanced preset, the one you see here with nothing else changed or turned off.

I find this to be an ideal go to preset.

If I want these and performance and fairly good visuals again, it's a to call forth readied CBU we have here.

So expect some drops to the level mid thirties under intensive circumstances, like any game play that takes place in ST Anne, for example.

But as you wander off into empty expanses or Marshall hands, the frame rate will really improve.

Hence the decent overall average.

If you were to exclusively spend your time in town, which is highly unlikely, then you'd be seeing closer to 45 ish with a skylight I three and a 57 100 X T, which I'd like to reiterate, isn't a combination that you should be considering.

And if you have a nice three already, well, it may be time to upgrade, though there are still a few instances where by it can handle itself fairly well.

Finally, I quickly tested faults of Horizon for the demo of the game.

That is.

I wasn't sure if this was going to be finished by the time that I actually uploaded this.

So this was a bit of an afterthought.

I've been downloading it all day again on my awful Internet, but yeah, it seems to run pretty well.

It's a very well optimized game, or at least I found, and it still looks fantastic as well, even if we do have to turn the settings down a little bit.

Thoughts of Horizon for is one of those games that looks great on any setting, to be honest.

And the vast open world certainly is a lot of fun to drive around, even with the eye.

3 61 100 in the system.

I'm sure the 16 Gigs of Ram helped a lot, though.

And if you were to put together a magic system with this at the heart of it, well, you might also be considering eight Gigs of RAM, which should also do an OK job.

Eight Gigs is probably the minimum you'd want to think about these days, and 16 gigs tends to be the sweet spot.

All right, so we may as well talk about the processing power itself when it comes to Cebu intensive tasks.

First, divorce in Avenge Our 20 scored 982 in the multi core test.

This is similar to what you might expect from an overcoat.

Athlon 3000 G.

It's not too bad from the eye.

Three.

It will do OK in day to day tasks.

Onda, as you can see gaming when it comes to editing, I fired up Premiere Pro on.

It was a bit of a mess as Faras video playback was concerned.

The CP struggled even with the video resolution in the preview window set to 1/4.

It's really isn't a very good CPU for editing, though.

Having said that, I did then install an older version of Premiere Pro Sisi 2015 the version that I've spent most of my time with Andi that performed a lot better.

In fact, the video preview playback was flawless.

So it may just be this latest version off the software, which I have noticed does struggle to playback smoothly, even with my rising 5 1600 F at times.

So bear that in mind.

It's okay.

You can get away with editing on a chip like this.

It just won't be as good as, say, something that has for physical cause or Maur.

With all that sudden down, I hope you've enjoyed a look back at the eye 3 61 100 I've certainly had a great time messing around with it.

If you did leave a like on this video below, leave a dislike below.

If you didn't enjoy the video, subscribe to the channel.

If you haven't done so already on in the next one will be gaming at four a teepee.