I'd liketothank a guybythenameofJamesonInstagramforpackingmyinboxwithbenchmarkfigurestosharewithyouandforhelpingmeoutwiththisoverallvideo, becausegettingholdofoneofthesehasproventobequitedifficult.
Andthat's thisthing's firstproblemin 2000 and 18.
Launchingat $649 inAugustof 2015 arenineNano.
Smallsizewasthecompleteoppositeofitsmammothpricetag, basedonthesameFijiGPUfoundinthecompaniesareknownFuryandFury X, TheNanofeaturedfourand 96 stringprocesses 256 textureunits, fourgigabytesof H B M orhighbandwithmemory.
Ondaonegigahertzboostclock, whichwasvariableandwoulddynamicallyadjusttomaintain a sub 175 Whatpowerdrawer.
Yourbestbetiswhenoneinanonlineauctionwheretheycanbehadfor a littleless.
Itsperformanceiscomparabletoinvideos 9 80 ormoderndayGTX 10 60 orevenour X 5 80 Thereamthesetinypowerhousewillevenoutperformthelatterin a lotoftitles.
Somereviewsfrom a coupleofyearsagosay 14.
40 p wasthesweetspotandmademostsensefrom a priceperformanceperspective.
So, luckily, today's benchmarksare 14 40 p basedagain, as I hadhelpwiththisvideo.
Thegameplayisn't representativeofthecard.
ButtheprecisefiguresareinGrafformat.
Solet's take a lookatsomeresults.
Firstly, let's lookatfalloutfortheNanois a bitoutoftheusualrangeofhardwarewetalkabouthere.
Butasitnowoccupies a placeinthehierarchythat's closetothepopular 10 60 I thoughtthatthoseofyoushoppingaroundinthatpricerangemaywanttohearaboutitisit's notreallyspokenoffthesedaysonasyoucansee, itstillhasthepowertotearthroughTripleeighttitles.
I expectthereasonyoudon't seemanyvideosonitthesedaysisbecauseofitssomewhatlackofavailability.
So I'd havetosay, ifyouseeonegoingforaroundthepriceof a 10 60 or a littlelessthanitmaybeworthyourinvestment.
ThereareplentyofforumsonlineatplaceslikeRedditthatdiscussedtheadvantagesanddisadvantagesoffsuch a cardin 2000 and 18 and I'd advisereadingasmuchinfoasyoucanonthislittlebeastkingdomcomeDeliveranceherelookstoperformtheworstoftoday's games, butthisis a prettydemandingtitlethathasseensomeperformanceimprovements, thoughevenonmy 10 70 system, I stillgetstuttersatnotonlyhigherresolutionsbuthighersettingsatfullHDaswell.
It's always a goodtitletotest, topush a varietyofgraphicscardstotheirlimit.
MiddleEarthShadowofWar, like a CD, willrun a closerto 30 than 60 FBsathigherresolutions.
Buttheultrasettingsinthisgameareverydemanding.
Stillthereno, nopowerthroughit.
Andjudgingbytheseresults, I'd say 10 80 p withthehighsettingsshouldbeenoughtomaintain a solid 60 f.
P s.
Justlikewithallthegamesdemonstratedintoday's videooverwhattreasurewouldexpectrunlike a dreamandwilldoon a rangeofhardware.
Butit's nicetosee a solidaverage, evenwith a mixtureofthehigheringamesettings.
Sorryabouttheformatofthisgraph.
Itmakestheperformancelookbadatfirstglance, butthat 1% lowof 87 hopefullyreflectswhatshouldbe a nicearoundexperience.
Finally, it's fortnight.
It's notallthatdemanding, butitisverypopularandwellstillputmoreof a strainonyoursystemthansomeoftheothergamesduetotheuseoftheUNrielengine.
Here, though, itdidjustfine.
As I saidbefore, theNanois a bitmorehighendthanstuffweusuallycover, buttome, everythingaboutitmakesitfascinating.
Andifitwasn't a scarceasitis, thenitmaybe a muchmoreconsiderableoptionforthoseofyoushoppingfor 10 sixtiesorfiveeighties, though, ifyoudoseeonefor a similarpriceandareworkingonbuildingan I T.
X system, thenit's still a verycapableoption.
Remember, though, thatunlikeoptingfor a newGPU, a usedournineNanomaynowcomewith a roughminingpast a czwell, andunlessthesellerisveryhonest, there's notalways a wayofknowingwhetherthat's trueornot.
As I saidbefore, ifyouplanonbuyingtheradioarenine.
Nanado a lotofresearchonthembeforehand.
Asforthisvideo, though, I hopeyouguyshaveenjoyedit.
Ifyoudidleave a lightonitdownbelow, leave a dislike.