字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, MY NEXT GUEST THIS EVENING IS A FORMER MAYOR OF CHICAGO, U.S. CONGRESSMAN AND WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF, HE'S WRITTEN A NEW BOOK CALLED "THE NATION CITY." PLEASE WELCOME MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL! ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) ( BAND PLAYING ) ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) ( BAND PLAYING ) >> Stephen: WELCOME BACK. WELCOME BACK, YOUR HONOR. >> I HAVEN'T SEEN PEOPLE STAND LIKE THAT SINCE THE HIGH HOLIDAYS. THAT'S IMPRESSIVE. >> Stephen: NICE TO HAVE YOU BACK. >> THANK YOU. >> Stephen: NOW, LAST TIME YOU WERE HERE, YOU SAID, YOU KNOW, DEMOCRATS FALL IN LOVE, THEY HAVE TO FALL IN LOVE WITH A CANDIDATE. AFTER NEVADA, IS THAT IT? ARE WE HITCHED? ARE WE IN LOVE WITH BERNIE SANDERS? ARE THE DEMOCRATS ALL IN FOR HIM? THEY'RE SWOONING, A LOT OF ENTHUSIASTIC PEOPLE. ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) >> NO, WE'RE NOT. WE'VE GOT A WAYS TO GO ON THIS. >> Stephen: BUT EVERYBODY'S SAYING IT'S OVER. CHRIS MATTHEWS HAS TO BE MEDICATED! >> FOR CHRIS, IT'S COVERED BY BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD, SO DON'T WORRY ABOUT THAT. >> Stephen: ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT BERNIE? BECAUSE YOU'RE THE DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT ALL IN A BLUE SUIT THERE, YOU ARE THE DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT, CHIEF OF STAFF, CONGRESSMAN, DEMOCRATIC MAYOR OF CHICAGO. COME ON! HERE'S THE RULES I WOULD SAY, LAST HUNDRED YEARS, THREE DEMOCRATS HAVE WON REELECTION FOR PRESIDENT -- FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT, PRESIDENT CLINTON, BARACK OBAMA. >> Stephen: YEAH, YEAH. OKAY. ( CHEERING ) THAT'S GOOD. REMEMBER, A REALLY REALLY GOOD CHIEF OF STAFF. ( LAUGHTER ) BOTH RAN WITH THE SAME STRATEGY AS DID THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS IN 2006 AND 2018 OF AN URBAN SUBURBAN METROPOLITAN COALITION. BERNIE IS SAYING FORGET THAT, SCREW IT. BASICALLY, THERE ARE ABOUT 70 MILLION SOCIALISTS READY TO BE AWOKEN TO THEIR INNER SOCIALIST. SAYING TO YOUR OUR ONE THROUGH SIX GOAL IS TO GET RID OF DONALD TRUMP, IS A REALLY BIG RISK TO GO ON A POLITICAL STRATEGY THAT HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED BEFORE. YOU HAVE TWO RECENT MEMORIES OF BOTH PRESIDENT CLINTON AND PRESIDENT OBAMA WHO WON THEIR ELECTION ON A SINGLE STRATEGY AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO THROW IT AWAY AND SAY WE DON'T NEED THESE FICKLE INDEPENDENT VOTERS, WE'RE GOING TO DO IT ON A BASE TURNOUT. AND WE'VE ONLY HAD THREE ELECTIONS, BUT YOU HAVEN'T HAD A SIZABLE EXPONENTIALLY INCREASED TURNOUT IN THESE PRIMARIES, MEANING HE IS NOT GENERATING THE TYPE OF SUPPORT HE SAID WOULD HAPPEN. SO MY VIEW IS IT'S TOO EARLY TO SAY IT'S OVER, HE IS THE FRONTRUNNER, WELCOME TO THE N.B.A. IF HE WINS BIG ON SUPER TUESDAY, HAS A DELEGATE RUN, THEN WE HAVE A PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE, WE'RE NOT THERE YET. >> Stephen: WHAT DO YOU THINK HAPPENS TOMORROW NIGHT? BECAUSE LAST WEEK EVERYBODY HAD THE KNIVES OUT FOR BLOOMBERG, NOW THAT BERNIE IS OUT FRONT -- >> THIS IS NUTS. BLOOMBERG IS NOT ON THE BALLOT, THE FRONTRUNNER IS TREE FEET OVER THIS WAY, YOU'RE SWACKING AT THIS GUY, AND THE GUY HERE IN VIOLATION WHERE IS ONE OF THE WORST MASS SHOOTINGS IN AMERICAN HISTORY. BERNIE SANDERS IS AGAINST ASSAULT WEAPON BAN AND NOBODY BRINGS THE SUBJECT UP AND THAT'S NUTS. IF YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO BRING THE SUBJECT UP, THAT'S POLITICAL 101. ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) >> Stephen: ARE YOU HERE TONIGHT TO KNEE CAB BERNIE SANDERS BECAUSE YOU'RE SWEEPING A LEG HERE, MAN. >> NO, HERE'S THE THING. YOU HAVE A PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST. YOU HAVE THE U.S. SENATE WITH A GOOD CHANCE TO TAKE IT. YOU HAVE THE HOUSE ELECTIONS WHERE WE HAVE A MAJORITY THERE. YOU HAVE ALL THE GOVERNORSHIPS, STATE HOUSES UP. SO IT'S NOT JUST A PRESIDENTIAL. THIS IS A NATIONAL ELECTION OF NATIONAL IMPORT. >> Stephen: WHY DO YOU THINK BERNIE IS LEADING THEM? >> BECAUSE I THINK ALL THE OPPOSITION IS DIVIDED. TEN YEARS AGO, STEVE -- >> Stephen: I DON'T KNOW WHO THE STEVE GUY IS, BUT GO AHEAD, YEAH. >> HE WAS MY FRIEND THE OTHER DAY. >> Stephen: SURE. GO AHEAD. >> TEN YEARS AGO, IF YOU, IN 1992, 1996, IF YOU WON A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, IN 2008, IF YOU HAD BEEN THIRD OR FOURTH THREE TIMES IN A ROW, YOU WOULD BE OUT. BUT BECAUSE OF THE INTERNET AND ALL THE FUNDRAISING THAT'S GOING ON, EVERYBODY IS GOING TO STAY AROUND THE HOOP THINKING THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR BERNIE TO BE THERE AND YOU HAVE FOUR OR FIVE PEOPLE STILL ON THE FIELD AND THEY SHOULD BE BY THIS TIME OFF THE FIELD AND THEN IT WOULD GO ONE ON ONE. >> Stephen: WHO SHOULD GO FIRST. >> NOT FOR ME TO SAY. >> Stephen: YOU'RE ALREADY SAYING IT! ( LAUGHTER ) WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA BY WHICH SOMEONE SHOULD LEAVE. DON'T NAME NAMES. >> IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, THERE'S ONLY ONE MEDDLE, THERE'S NOT GOLD, SILVER AND BRONZE. SO MY VIEW IS, IF YOU HAVEN'T PRETTY SOON GET A GOLD, YOU HAVE TO GET OFF THE DANCE FLOOR. >> Stephen: BERNIE IS ABOUT REVOLUTION. OBAMA WAS ABOUT CHANGE. IS THERE NOT ENOUGH CHANGE AND THAT'S WHY HE THINKS WE NEED A REVOLUTION? >> SO IT'S INTERESTING YOU SAY THIS. >> Stephen: IT USUALLY IS. ( LAUGHTER ) >> YEAH. YOU DO HAVE HOME COURT ADVANTAGE HERE. >> Stephen: OH, YEAH. I'LL COME ON YOUR TALK SHOW SOME DAY. ( PIANO RIFF ) >> I DON'T WANT TO SEE THAT. IT WILL NOT BE -- IT'S NOT A FAMILY FRIENDLY TALK SHOW. >> Stephen: I KNOW, I'VE TALKED TO YOU OFF CAMERA. ( LAUGHTER ) >> HERE'S THE WAY I LOOK AT IT, THERE ARE ALL THESE FORCES THAT FORCE TRUMP AND HE'S TAKEN OVER THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. THE TRUTH IS -- NOW, I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THE POLITICS OF REFORM VERSUS REVOLUTION, I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT BILL CLINTON AND BARACK OBAMA REPRESENTED IN THE CHANGE, THAT THERE WERE FORCES THAT, GIVEN THE IRAQ WAR IN 2008, THEY WERE BUILDING. PRESIDENT OBAMA, IN THE PRIMARY AGAINST HILLARY CLINTON, BECAUSE OF HIS POSITION ON THE WAR, REPRESENTED A BIG, BIG, SIGNIFICANT CHANGE, AND IT WAS WHAT THE BASE OF THE PARTY AT THAT TIME, THE LEFT SAID, THAT'S GOOD ENOUGH. BARACK OBAMA AGAINST THE WAR, LET'S GO. BY 2012, BERNIE SANDERS WANTED TO PRIMARY BARACK OBAMA, AND THE LEFT WAS NOT HAPPY WITH HIS PRESIDENCY. PRESIDENT OBAMA KEPT WHAT'S HAPPENING NOW, BASICALLY TEN YEARS BACK, AND IT'S NOW COMING BACK BOTH THROUGH BARACK OBAMA AND THROUGH HILLARY CLINTON. >> Stephen: SO BERNIE WANTED A PRIMARY, WHO STOPPED THAT? >> A LOT OF DEMOCRATIC LEADERS. >> Stephen: SAID DON'T DO THAT. >> BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF POLITICS, IF YOU HAVE A PRIMARY, YOU'RE LIKELY TO LOSE THE GENERAL ELECTION. SO IT WAS SCUTTLED. BUT BACK IN 2012, BERNIE WAS TALKING ABOUT PRIMARYING THE PRESIDENT, BECAUSE HE KEPT ALL OF THAT BACK. >> Stephen: IS HE A DEMOCRAT, IN YOUR OPINION? >> NO, HE'S A DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, HE SAYS, BUT IN THE GENERAL ELECTION, HE WILL BE A SOCIALIST BY THE TIME TRUMP AND THE RUSSIA'S ARE DONE WITH IT. >> Stephen: DO YOU BELIEVE THAT, BY THE WAY, THAT THE RUSSIA'S ARE HELPING BERNIE IN ORDER TO SET HIM UP AGAINST TRUMP? >> I THINK THE RUSSIANS -- THE RUSSIANS ARE ALL ABOUT CONFUSION, CHAOS. THEY SUCCEED WHEN AMERICA IS FIGHT AGAINST ITSELF RATHER THAN FOCUSING ON IMPROVING ITS OWN. ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ) >> Stephen: YOUR FORMER WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF WHO LOOKS LIKE A PRESIDENT TO YOU? WHO UP THERE CAN YOU IMAGINE TO SEE? BIDEN? >> HERE'S WHAT I LOOK FOR -- I USED TO SAY THIS NO PRESIDENT CLINTON -- IF WE KNEW THE FIRST YEAR FIRST TERM WHAT WE KNEW IN THE FIRST YEAR SECOND TERM, WE WOULD ALL BE GENIUSES. WHAT I LOOK FOR, HAVE YOU FAILED AND HAVE YOU LEARNED FROM THAT? QUICK PIECE OF HISTORY, IN PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S TERMS, HE HAD THE BAY OF PIGS AND A DISASTER. HE APPLIED A LESSON IN THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS. HAD HE NOT HAD THAT FAILURE AND UPDISASTER WHO KNOWS WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IN THE CUBAN MISSILE DISASTER. BUT THE QUESTION FOR THE PRESIDENT IS DO THEY HAVE THE CHARACTER, JUDGMENT AND THE SELF-AWARENESS TO LEARN FROM THEIR MISTAKES. I THINK THEY'VE SHOWN THAT IN THEIR CAREER BUT NOT SHOWN THE POLITICAL SKILL IN THIS CAMPAIGN. >> Stephen: BACK WITH MORE FORMER CHICAGO MAYOR RAMY RAHM EMANUEL, EVERYBODY.
B1 中級 市長拉赫姆-伊曼紐爾(Rahm Emanuel)尋找失敗的候選人,並從這些失敗中吸取教訓。 (Mayor Rahm Emanuel Looks For Candidates Who Have Failed And Learned From Those Failures) 3 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字