Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • In May 2014, the European Court of Justice ruled that internet users have the quoteright

    2014年的五月,歐洲聯盟法院法令規定網路使用者有:"被遺忘的權力"

  • to be forgotten”. They ordered Google to remove undesirable links to personal data

    法院命令,若有使用者提出要求,Google必須移除

  • that isinaccurate, inadequate, irrelevant or excessivewhen asked to do so. However,

    「不正確、不適當、不相關或者過度渲染」的個人資訊。然而,

  • opponents of the ruling say that it is a form of censorship, and could have a chilling effect

    反對者反駁這也是一種審查權,且可能會對網路言論產生所謂的寒禪效應,

  • on internet speech. So, should you have the right to be forgotten on the internet?

    所以,我們到底該不該在網路上有所謂的被遺忘的權力呢?

  • This idea is actually not a new legal concept. A decade ago, the 1995 European Union Data

    這個想法其實並不新。在十年前,1995年歐盟資料保護指令

  • Protection Directive set the stage for updated privacy rules in the digital era. With the

    增加對於數位資料世代符合時代要求的隱私權規範。

  • ubiquitous nature of internet record keeping, erasing information is not as easy as it used

    由於網路無所不在的特性,要將個人資訊完全清除日益困難。

  • to be. Many believe legal protections need to catch up with the 21st century.

    許多人認為身處21世紀的我們應該享有相對與時俱進的法律保護。

  • The problem with the right to be forgotten is that it inherently contradicts the right

    被遺忘權的問題在於它在本質上與言論自由的意涵相違背。

  • to free speech. A person cannot simply have information removed because he or she disagrees

    一個人不能單單因為他或她不認同或不喜歡某則資訊就要求移除。

  • with or dislikes its content. But when information fits the profile ofinaccurate, inadequate,

    但是,一旦這個資訊符合「不正確、不適當、

  • irrelevant or excessive”, courts will have to weigh how damaging the information is to

    不相關或者過度渲染」等特性時,法院將會權衡這則資訊對當事人所造成的損害

  • the person versus how relevant that information is to the public. Often the decisions are

    相對於這項資訊對於社會大眾"知的權力" 孰輕孰重。往往,

  • made on a case-by-case basis. Examples would be arrest records, revealing photos, regrettable

    判決的結果都因案子內容而不同。像是有犯罪記錄、裸露的帳片、

  • tweets, and even false accusations or rumors.

    後悔發出的推特,甚至不實指控或是謠言等。

  • However, critics of the ruling point to some controversial cases as examples of unnecessary

    然而,部分有審查權爭議的案子是造成批評判決的主因

  • censorship. One news agency reports that a story about a Scottish man who strangled his

    某個新聞從業機構報導一個蘇格蘭男子在2002年使他的老婆窒息而死的故事,

  • wife in 2002 was removed by Google as a result of the new ruling. Other stories, which may

    由於新法上路而從Google上被刪除的案例。還有其他的故事,

  • be important to the public, pertaining to things likes tax evasion or theft, were also

    也許對於社會大眾有其重要性,像是許多關於逃漏稅或是竊盜的新聞,

  • deleted. Many feel that this kind of removal of information violates freedom of speech,

    也都遭到刪除。許多人感到類似這種的資訊遭到刪除是一種對言論自由和

  • and public access to data. About a quarter million requests for Google to remove information

    社會大眾獲取資料權力的一種傷害。大約已經有25萬件對Google申請要求移除資訊

  • have already been made.

    被提出來。

  • Currently, the ECJ ruling affects only search results on the European version of Google,

    現在,歐盟法院規定此法令只對歐洲版 Google 產生效力,

  • and the removed results still appear when searched on Google.com. No actual content

    而且那些被移除的資料仍然可以在Google.com上被搜尋到。其實沒有任何資料

  • is erased, and the nature of the internet suggests it will exist indefinitely. So, unfortunately,

    真的被移除,而且由於網路的本質使得沒有人能確定的說這些資料已被永遠移除。所以,不幸地,

  • according to current laws, whether or not you have theright to be forgotten”,

    根據現行法令,不論你是否有"被遺忘的權力",

  • is mostly irrelevant.

    其實並不重要。

  • Google, despite struggles is one of the most powerful companies in the world. To learn

    Google 在面對這樣的挑戰之時,仍是世界上最有影響力的公司之一。要了解

  • more about how influential they really aretake a look at our video here. Click the link

    這家公司的影響力,請看看這部影片。點擊

  • in the description to see the whole thing. Thanks for watchinTestTube, don’t forget

    上面的連結可看到完整的影片內容。謝謝您收看TestTube,別忘了

  • to subscribe!

    要訂閱喔!

In May 2014, the European Court of Justice ruled that internet users have the quoteright

2014年的五月,歐洲聯盟法院法令規定網路使用者有:"被遺忘的權力"

字幕與單字

影片操作 你可以在這邊進行「影片」的調整,以及「字幕」的顯示

B1 中級 中文 英國腔 移除 資訊 法院 權力 資料 網路

你有權利在網上被遺忘嗎? (Do You Have The Right To Be Forgotten Online?)

  • 516 31
    Karen Chan 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字