fec
US
・UK
A1 初級
abbr.縮寫聯邦選舉委員會
影片字幕
人工智能擴展計算互聯技術的性能評估 UAL vs UALoE SU (Performance Evaluation of Interconnect Technologies for AI Scale Up Computing UAL vs UALoE SU)
19:49
- FEC by itself is not sufficient here.
FEC 本身在這裡是不夠的。
- And the FEC has its own limitations.
而 FEC 本身也有它的限制。
長老們對Deez Nuts藤蔓編譯的反應 (Elders React to Deez Nuts Vine Compilation)
06:44
- paperwork with the FEC
FEC(聯邦選舉委員會)提出
川普遭判有罪,本就吃緊的資金是否能再承擔判決後不斷增加的法律費用? (Can Donald Trump Afford Mounting Legal Bills Following Guilty Conviction?)
09:30
- When he became the presumptive Republican nominee in March, FEC filings showed that Trump's campaign had $33 million in cash on hand.
今年 3 月他成為共和黨推定候選人時,聯邦選舉委員會的文件顯示,川普的競選團隊手頭有 3300 萬美元現金。
- But because the FEC has exempted leadership packs from that general prohibition, that's what we see happening.
但由於聯邦選舉委員會將上司包豁免於一般禁令之外,這就是我們看到的情況。
原來行賄這麼簡單?不專業教學帶你了解在美國如何「賄賂」政客 (So You Want to Bribe a Politician)
04:37
- Citizens United v. FEC.
聯合公民訴聯邦選舉委員會案。
- Speechnow.org v. FEC; also in 2010.
Speechnow.org 訴聯邦選舉委員會案。也在 2010 年。
埃隆-馬斯克是對民主的威脅 (Elon Musk Is A Threat To Democracy)
22:04
- March ruling by the FEC, campaigns can now share information and data on efforts to promote voter turnout with outside groups. So now super PACs can coordinate directly with candidates and their campaigns, at least on their voter turnout efforts. Because of this, the Trump campaign, strapped for cash, both because they've been out-fundraised by Harris and because they're funding Trump's millions in legal fees, have outsourced their door-knocking and ground game efforts to outside groups like Elon's America PAC. And instead of spending any money on television ads, America PAC has spent over $100 million on canvassing and direct mail, both in support of
根據聯邦選舉委員會3月份的裁決,競選活動現在可以與外部團體共享有關促進選民投票率的資訊和數據。是以,現在超級政治行動委員會可以直接與候選人及其競選團隊協調,至少在選民投票率方面。正因為如此,資金緊張的特朗普競選團隊,既因為他們的資金被哈里斯超過,也因為他們要為特朗普提供數百萬美元的律師費,將他們的敲門和地面活動外包給了外部團體,如埃隆的美國政治行動委員會。美國政治行動委員會沒有在電視廣告上花一分錢,而是在拉票和直接郵寄上花費了超過1億美元,這兩項活動都是為了支持特朗普。
- Conservative Partnership Institute. That institute is led by Heritage Foundation president Jim DeMint with former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows serving as senior advisor. The web is purposely tangled because that's how you launder money and obscure your aims, make it too complicated to follow. And these are just the things we know about. Thanks to our absolutely bad campaign finance laws in the U.S., Elon could be throwing millions more at getting Trump elected and there's no way we could know about it. And that's perfectly legal. As are the misleading ads produced by Elon backed dark money group Building America's Future. Generally, the First Amendment protects against government intervention of speech except for very specific circumstances, and political speech is highly protected. Truth and advertising rules only apply to businesses untruthfully advertising products or services they're trying to sell, and they don't apply to political ads. Defamation claims brought by public officials have a notoriously high bar and I don't think these would qualify. Voter suppression is illegal, but it requires that the actor deceived qualified voters to prevent them from voting generally, not to prevent them from voting for a specific candidate. States are starting to pass laws barring the use of deceptive AI generated content in political ads, but that doesn't apply here either. Again, for Elon and the other billionaires both here and abroad using their money to influence us and how we vote in this election, campaign finance laws and the FEC provide enough loopholes and weak enforcement that they can get away with pretty much anything scot-free. And outside the realm of directly tampering with our elections through funding dark money networks and door knocking for Trump, Elon also has the benefit of owning one of the largest social media companies in the world and sending daily propaganda to his 200 million followers. Lately, this has included tweets wondering why no one has tried to unalive Kamala
保守黨夥伴關係研究所。該研究所由傳統基金會主席吉姆-德明特(Jim DeMint)上司,特朗普前幕僚長馬克-梅多斯(Mark Meadows)擔任高級顧問。這張網被故意糾結在一起,因為這就是你洗錢和掩蓋你的目的的方式,讓它變得太複雜而難以追蹤。而這些僅僅是我們所知道的。多虧了美國糟糕透頂的競選財務法,埃隆可能為特朗普當選再投入數百萬美元,而我們卻無從知曉。而這是完全合法的。埃隆支持的黑錢組織 "建設美國的未來"(Building America's Future)製作的誤導性廣告也是如此。一般來說,第一修